2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00278
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Topological Network Efficiency in Preschool Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study

Abstract: Background: The functional mechanism behind autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is not clear, but it is related to a brain connectivity disorder. Previous studies have found that functional brain connectivity of ASD is linked to both increased connections and weakened connections, and the inconsistencies in functional brain connectivity may be related to age. The functional connectivity in adolescents and adults with ASD is generally less than in age-matched controls; functional connectivity in younger children wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using six graph theoretical measures (i.e., CC, cPL, normalized CC, normalized cPL, SW, and modularity), the authors reported that the ASD group showed significantly lower modularity, but no significant differences were found in the other five measures. In a study conducted later by Qin et al ( 21 ), children with ASD (2.89 ± 0.97 years old) and TD children (3.15 ± 1.12 years old) were recruited. Among seven measures (i.e., CC, cPL, normalized CC, normalized cPL, SW, global and local efficiency), their DTI-derived structural network showed significantly lower cPL and higher global/local efficiency in children with ASD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using six graph theoretical measures (i.e., CC, cPL, normalized CC, normalized cPL, SW, and modularity), the authors reported that the ASD group showed significantly lower modularity, but no significant differences were found in the other five measures. In a study conducted later by Qin et al ( 21 ), children with ASD (2.89 ± 0.97 years old) and TD children (3.15 ± 1.12 years old) were recruited. Among seven measures (i.e., CC, cPL, normalized CC, normalized cPL, SW, global and local efficiency), their DTI-derived structural network showed significantly lower cPL and higher global/local efficiency in children with ASD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain tractography has been widely applied in developmental age, both in neurodevelopmental disorders, as ADHD [33] and autism spectrum disorders [34][35][36], and in neurological disorders, as leukodystrophies, cerebral palsy or cerebellar diseases [37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graph theory can be used to measure the brain network segregation (clustering coefficient and transitivity), integration (characteristic path length and efficiency), and centrality (betweenness centrality, eigenvector centrality, participation coefficient and within module z-score). Recent brain imaging studies have found topological differences between ASD and normal brains which can be quantified using graph theory, such as global alterations of characteristic path length and efficiency in ASD (Rudie et al, 2013; Itahashi et al, 2014; Zeng et al, 2017; Qin et al, 2018) as well as alterations to segregation measures (Barttfeld et al, 2011; Rudie et al, 2013; Leung et al, 2014; Keown et al, 2017; Zeng et al, 2017) and centrality measures(Di Martino et al, 2013; Leung et al, 2014; Balardin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%