“…By tuning the charge carrier concentration, chemical doping in SWCNTs modulates the Seebeck coefficient, S , and electrical conductivity, σ, of SWCNTs and significantly improves their TE power factor, S 2 σ . Currently, chemical doping in SWCNTs refers to charge transfer doping with the molecular/polymeric dopants chemisorbed on or encapsulated in the nanotubes. − , However, the efficiency of molecularly doping in carbon nanotubes is low and this necessitates employing dopant concentrations on the order of percent in practical applications. ,, Such bulky dopants may hinder the carrier transport across the nanotube–nanotube junctions, resulting in unsatisfactory σ values of the doped SWCNT networks. , Besides, the vulnerable organic dopants (degeneration at atmospheric condition/decomposition above 200 °C) narrow the operating range of the doped SWCNTs during processing or practical applications. − Substitutional doping is an alternative chemical doping scheme for SWCNTs, where heteroatoms (e.g., boron and nitrogen) substitute for the carbon in sp 2 lattice. , Thanks to the covalent interaction between the dopant and host atoms, a small amount of atomic dopants could efficiently increase the charge carrier number in SWCNTs and the resulted doped SWCNTs would have high structural stability. , To date, heteroatoms, such as nitrogen, boron, sulfur, silicon, and phosphorus, have been doped into carbon nanotubes, but atomically doped SWCNTs are rarely reported in the context of TE energy conversion applications. − …”