Enhanced service discovery in Bluetooth

Avancha, Sasikanth; Joshi, Anupam; Finin, Timothy W.

doi:10.1109/mc.2002.1009177

Cited by 61 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More dynamic and flexible discovery techniques are needed to support advanced retrieval features in pervasive computing scenarios [1]. Performance improvements of wireless communication technologies and increase in computing resources of mobile devices allow to pursue such more advanced techniques.…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

A semantic-based mobile registry for dynamic RFID-based logistics support

Ruta

Noia

Sciascio

et al. 2008

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Electronic Commerce

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we propose an extended version of the open source jUDDI implementation by the Apache Software Foundation, adapted to pervasive RFID contexts. The registry adopts an OWL-S 1.1 Profile instance annotation of mobile services and resources. Ontology-based metadata are exploited in order to perform a semantic-based service discovery w.r.t. a given request. The proposed framework has been devised for pervasive RFID-based logistics environments. A case study is presented along with experimental results on a prototype implementation.

show abstract

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

A semantic-based mobile registry for dynamic RFID-based logistics support

Ruta

Noia

Sciascio

et al. 2008

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Electronic Commerce

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, to overcome the network limitations we employ a Contract Net based negotiations among peers to determine which device will provide what data. For this we build upon our previous experience in service and data discovery as well as our previous work on MoGATU [2,10,28,30]. We employ both gossiping and pull-based techniques for advertising data and for querying peers.…”

Section: Collaboration Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The networking aspect of a collaboration in pervasive computing environments has been addressed in terms of device discovery and routing protocols [2,6,22,31,32]. To the best of our knowledge very little work has been done on the part of data collaboration/sharing in the pervasive computing environments, especially in the area of processing joins over multiple data sources.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative joins in a pervasive computing environment

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

show abstract

“…As pointed out in [2], Bluetooth SDP is largely inefficient when it comes to complex requests. In fact SD on Bluetooth only allows exact match discovery of uniquely identified services.…”

Section: Framework and Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Yet, if we want to search and retrieve resources whose description cannot be classified within a rigid schema (e.g. the description of paintings in a museum or goods in a shopping mall [2]) a more flexible SDP is needed. Such a SDP must be able also to cope with non-exact matches, and provide a ranked list of discovered resources, computing a distance between each retrieved resource and the requested one after a matchmaking process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%