Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced sensitivity of zinc phthalocyanine-based microporous humidity sensors by varying size of electrode gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the C value of the PhB‐sensor increases with exposure to the LA solution mainly because of the adsorption of protons to PhB molecules on the surface of the sensing medium, inducing the polarization of PhB/PVC composite‐sensing medium. [ 42,46 ] Based on these results, we can hypothesize that if the adsorption efficiency of the LA molecules to the PhB/PVC composite‐sensing medium is increased, the sensing performances of our PhB‐sensor can be dramatically improved by solving problems such as fast signal saturation and low linearity shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the C value of the PhB‐sensor increases with exposure to the LA solution mainly because of the adsorption of protons to PhB molecules on the surface of the sensing medium, inducing the polarization of PhB/PVC composite‐sensing medium. [ 42,46 ] Based on these results, we can hypothesize that if the adsorption efficiency of the LA molecules to the PhB/PVC composite‐sensing medium is increased, the sensing performances of our PhB‐sensor can be dramatically improved by solving problems such as fast signal saturation and low linearity shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The C values of the PhB‐sensors were measured to be 4.74 ± 0.10 pF in air and 21.9 ± 0.12 pF in DI water, confirming that the C of the PhB sensor increased even when exposed to DI water. This is because of two reasons, one is that the DI water itself interposed between the IDEs and acted as an additional capacitor, and the other is that the high polarity of water molecules induces polarization in the sensing medium, which could be related to increase in C. [ 42 ] The PhB‐sensors exposed to 0.01 m m LA solution showed C variations of 21.3 ± 0.24 pF, almost similar to those of DI water exposure. However, with the increase in concentrations of the LA solutions to 0.1, 1.0, and 5.0 m m , the C values increased to 35.5 ± 0.63, 139.2 ± 2.01, and 214.3 ± 3.86 pF, respectively, which confirmed a somewhat constant trend in C variations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1e and S4 shows the metal 2p XPS spectra for the MPc/OCB (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) catalysts, which confirms the loading of MPc in these samples. 29,43,44 In the case of the CoPc/OCB catalyst, the main peak in the low energy region has a position of 782.6 eV in Fig. 1e and can be assigned to the Co 2+ oxidation state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%