2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40537-019-0193-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Secured Map Reduce layer for Big Data privacy and security

Abstract: Data security, according to the common definition is confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data. It is the act of guaranteeing that the information is safe from unauthorized access, ensures that the information is reliable and accurate which is accessible whenever it is required. An information security design incorporates features, for example, gathering the required data, protecting it, and obliterating any data that is never again required [1]. Privacy, on the other hand, is the appropriate use of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regulation here can curb the adverse effects of these negative externalities arising from trading and significantly contribute to welfare efficient and complete markets (where supply equals demand) [25] [26]. Examples of practical ways to implement regulations suggested in existing literature include legislative property rights on consumer personal data shared between the supply and demand side [14], technical metrics (e.g., DP) being adopted by demand side data intermediaries (e.g., ad-networks) to check on the degree of IP breach [6], and frameworks such as those developed in [27,28,29,30] to improve security and privacy for BigData systems (e.g., HDFS). Specifically, in relation to the data intermediary settings such as in Figure 1, De Corni'ere and Nijs [31] For more details on the interplay between differential privacy and mechanism design, [7] gives a comprehensive survey.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulation here can curb the adverse effects of these negative externalities arising from trading and significantly contribute to welfare efficient and complete markets (where supply equals demand) [25] [26]. Examples of practical ways to implement regulations suggested in existing literature include legislative property rights on consumer personal data shared between the supply and demand side [14], technical metrics (e.g., DP) being adopted by demand side data intermediaries (e.g., ad-networks) to check on the degree of IP breach [6], and frameworks such as those developed in [27,28,29,30] to improve security and privacy for BigData systems (e.g., HDFS). Specifically, in relation to the data intermediary settings such as in Figure 1, De Corni'ere and Nijs [31] For more details on the interplay between differential privacy and mechanism design, [7] gives a comprehensive survey.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For enterprises, the most important aspect of digitalization is to improve the efficiency of business processes. Thus, the most common digitization tool can be considered the use of Big data [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With organisations reaping much benefit from Big Data Analytics, there is a growing urgency to adopt similar techniques in order to gain real-time insights into individuals’ well-being in order to target aid interventions to vulnerable groups ( UN, 2013 ). While there is a timely discussion pertaining to the ethical use of big data analytics ( Chen & Quan-Haase, 2018 ) with key concerns centred on privacy and security ( Fang et al, 2017 , Jain et al, 2019 ), it is argued that if the abundance of data, advanced technologies, and creative analytical approaches are responsibly enacted, this can lead to responsive, efficient, and evidence-based decision-making which may further improve the progress of the SDG goals, in particular SD3, in a comprehensive and reasonable manner (UN, 2018).…”
Section: Un Sdgs Big Data and Well-being: A Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%