2005 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2005.1651681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced schemes for L2 handover in IEEE 802.11 networks and their evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often a sort of background passive scanning is employed where the node learns about the next available APs while still connected to the current AP [86]. The authors in [36] propose a similar solution, called "frequency combination algorithm", which actively scans for as many as four neighboring APs as the train moves to create a "neighbor graph".…”
Section: B Roaming Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often a sort of background passive scanning is employed where the node learns about the next available APs while still connected to the current AP [86]. The authors in [36] propose a similar solution, called "frequency combination algorithm", which actively scans for as many as four neighboring APs as the train moves to create a "neighbor graph".…”
Section: B Roaming Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been proposed to reduce or even eliminate the impact of the scanning phase during handover. Montavont et al [6] proposed an optimization to this process by performing short interleaved scanning phases with on-going data communication. In SyncScan [7], Ramani and Savage investigated a modification of the infrastructure where the APs synchronously broadcast beacon frames on the same channel so that the MS just needs to switch the channel and wait for a short period to retrieve the available APs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of beacon loss, scanning can miss an available AP, especially in dense deployments, like those discuses in [11,12]. To overcome this issue, a solution is to use repeated multiple scans, split into short interleaved scanning phases as described in [6]. However, this approach is not applicable to vehicular communications, as the sensed values become rapidly obsolete because of the relatively high velocity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most authors assume a regular WLAN with several APs operating on various frequencies and a relatively slow mobility amongst the MNs. In [20], Montavont et al present the idea of periodic scanning, where an MN performs scans for possible new APs already while it is still connected with good channel quality to an AP. Short probes sent out on varying channels interfere with the ongoing data traffic but, on the other hand, the MN is ready for the handover execution phase as soon as the need for a handover arises.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%