“…All of the 55 articles investigated the impact of ERAS/FTS on clinical outcomes compared with conventional care mode involved in colorectal surgery (n = 13), [ 3 , 31 – 42 ] liver surgery (n = 7), [ 43 – 49 ] gastric surgery (n = 7), [ 22 , 50 – 55 ] orthopedic surgery (n = 3), [ 56 – 58 ] bariatric surgery (n = 3), [ 59 – 61 ] urology surgery (n = 3), [ 62 – 64 ] breast surgery (n = 3), [ 65 – 67 ] esophageal surgery (n = 3), [ 68 – 70 ] pancreatic surgery (n = 3) [ 71 – 73 ] and other surgeries (n = 10) [ 4 , 74 – 82 ] including gynecologic surgery, [ 74 ] abdominal aortic aneurysm repair surgery, [ 76 ] lung surgery [ 77 ] and vascular operations. [ 79 ] The most clinical results were measured in the meta-analyses are length of hospital stay (LOS)/post-operative hospital stay (PLOS) (n = 47), cost (n = 16), mortality (n = 30), morbidity (n = 54), readmission (n = 42), reoperation (n = 8) and other secondary outcomes.…”