2020
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09174-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: A Case-Matched Analysis of Perioperative and Pain Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, the published literature supporting ERAS protocols strongly suggests their efficacy in a variety of surgical fields. Head and neck oncologic patients stand to uniquely benefit from such centralized, multidisciplinary protocols 14–17 . These patients have a variety of needs given the complexity of their surgical and medical care, which may affect multiple facets of their recovery, including breathing, eating, nutrition, pain, speech, swallowing, and communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, the published literature supporting ERAS protocols strongly suggests their efficacy in a variety of surgical fields. Head and neck oncologic patients stand to uniquely benefit from such centralized, multidisciplinary protocols 14–17 . These patients have a variety of needs given the complexity of their surgical and medical care, which may affect multiple facets of their recovery, including breathing, eating, nutrition, pain, speech, swallowing, and communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the composition of interventions comprising an ERAS protocol has differed amongst the many head and neck institutions reporting results of their ERAS implementation, the results of these implementations are often similar. In particular, implementation studies have demonstrated that, compared to control groups treated with conventional perioperative care, ERAS patient cohorts experience reduced ICU and hospital stays, reduced delay between surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, diminished narcotic use in the first 24-72 h after surgery, and fewer overall complications [13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Eras For Major Head and Neck Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of multimodal analgesia in the postoperative setting has been shown to reduce overall opioid use and expedite recovery [12,[90][91][92] . Pain regimens consisting of multiple opioid-sparing analgesics, such as gabapentin, acetaminophen, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), have demonstrated synergistic effects and enable the reservation of opioids for breakthrough pain alone [13] . Gabapentin, in particular, appears to provide a significant ameliorative effect on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption when administered preoperatively and continued in the postoperative setting [93,94] .…”
Section: Pain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant reduction in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) required over 72 h was seen in the ERAS group (138.8 ± 181.5 vs. 207.9 ± 205.5; p \ 0.001). 12 This study represents a key addition to the ERAS literature in general and sets the standard for perioperative management for major head and neck surgery requiring free-flap reconstruction. The HNRS-ERAS pathway described should become a cornerstone of managing these complex patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of Annals of Surgical Oncology, Kiong et al use this comprehensive Head and Neck/Reconstructive Surgery ERAS (HNRS-ERAS) pathway and narrow the definition of major head and neck surgery to oncologic surgeries requiring microvascular free-flap reconstruction, since these procedures are complex, involve significant blood loss and postoperative pain, as well as lengthy hospital stays and complex multidisciplinary rehabilitation. 12 The investigators conducted a case-matched cohort study using the HNRS-ERAS pathway to intervene and track outcomes based on the principles of patient education, goal-directed fluid management, multimodal analgesia, and early mobilization. The outcomes tracked were based on the HNRS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%