2014
DOI: 10.1364/boe.5.004213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced quantitative phase imaging in self-interference digital holographic microscopy using an electrically focus tunable lens

Abstract: Self-interference digital holographic microscopy (DHM) has been found particular suitable for simplified quantitative phase imaging of living cells. However, a main drawback of the self-interference DHM principle are scattering patterns that are induced by the coherent nature of the laser light which affect the resolution for detection of optical path length changes. We present a simple and efficient technique for the reduction of coherent disturbances in quantitative phase images. Therefore, amplitude and pha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neurons exhibit growth rates an order of magnitude smaller than adherent cells, which, due to mitosis, double in mass, roughly, every 10-40 hours (see for points of comparison [55, 56]). In practice, this introduces an instrument sensitivity requirement that is difficult to meet with many methods as imaging artifacts often exceed the 0.15 Rad phase shift of a typical neurite[12, 57]. Comparing to limited previous efforts, the values reported in this work are comparable with those in[58], within variability due to cell type and confluence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Neurons exhibit growth rates an order of magnitude smaller than adherent cells, which, due to mitosis, double in mass, roughly, every 10-40 hours (see for points of comparison [55, 56]). In practice, this introduces an instrument sensitivity requirement that is difficult to meet with many methods as imaging artifacts often exceed the 0.15 Rad phase shift of a typical neurite[12, 57]. Comparing to limited previous efforts, the values reported in this work are comparable with those in[58], within variability due to cell type and confluence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Neurons exhibit growth rates an order of magnitude smaller than adherent cells, which, due to mitosis, double in mass, roughly, every 10-40 hours (see for points of comparison [24,64]). In practice, this introduces an instrument sensitivity requirement that is difficult to meet with many methods as imaging artifacts often exceed the 0.15 Rad phase shift of a typical neurite [12,65]. Comparing to limited previous efforts, the values reported in this work are comparable with those in reference [66], within variability due to cell type and confluence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The second strategy is based on optical instrumentation development. 18 , 19 As far as QP images in a microscopy setting are concerned, efficient coherent noise reduction approaches based on either object or camera motion, or on the use of different laser modes have been developed. 20 22 Specifically, in a transmission configuration aimed at exploring biological cells, a lateral shift of the camera 21 significantly reduced the coherent noise, while a noise reduction approaching the ideal curve of was obtained by slightly moving the object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%