2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2011.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced pulverized coal mass flow measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(17) is comparatively appropriate to correlate the experimental data in comparison with Eqs. (15) and (16). Over the data range quoted, Eq.…”
Section: = ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(17) is comparatively appropriate to correlate the experimental data in comparison with Eqs. (15) and (16). Over the data range quoted, Eq.…”
Section: = ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacitive method [3][4][5][6], electrostatic method [7], electromagnetic method [8], optical method [9], acoustic method [10,11] and radiometric method [6,12] are volume-dependent ones. The Coriolis method [13], pressure drop method [6,14], gravimetric method [15,16], and thermal method [17][18][19] belong to the mass-dependent category.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the pulverized coal in powder feeding tube is a gas-solid flow, it is difficult to measure online. The current methods are generally heat balance method, the heat transfer method, laser method, capacitance, ultrasonic method and so on [2][3][4][5][6][7]. And the ultrasonic one uses the value of threshold to measure the time delay of ultrasonic to calculate the pulverized coal concentration in the most situations, whose anti-jamming capacity, however, is comparatively poor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%