2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.104.132301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Production of Direct Photons inAu+AuCollisions atsNN=200GeVand Imp

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
108
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, because the dispersion relation of the current model does not cross the light cone, we would not expect to observe a peak in the photon production due to J=c . This is then consistent with the recent experimental report [40] on photon production with Au-Au collision at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 200 GeV by the PHENIX collaboration. This suggests that in the future holographic constructions, certain constraints from experiment on limiting velocity should be taken into account.…”
Section: Limiting Velocitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, because the dispersion relation of the current model does not cross the light cone, we would not expect to observe a peak in the photon production due to J=c . This is then consistent with the recent experimental report [40] on photon production with Au-Au collision at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 200 GeV by the PHENIX collaboration. This suggests that in the future holographic constructions, certain constraints from experiment on limiting velocity should be taken into account.…”
Section: Limiting Velocitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings are derived from the observation of elliptic flow [12][13][14][15][16], electromagnetic spectra [17,18], quarkonium melting [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], enhanced strangeness production [27][28][29][30][31][32] and jet quenching [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]; for a very recent review, see ref. [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the differences can be explained by a differing case mix and definition of diarrhea. The patients in the present study had several risk factors for diarrhea which were likely to contribute to the observed high diarrhea incidence: use of a hyperosmolar formula in both study groups [22]; a relatively high administration rate of the enteral nutrition [23]; the presence of hypoalbuminemia in all study patients [24, 25]; and frequent use of antibiotics in 77% of patients [26, 27]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%