2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced precipitation hardening in an alumina reinforced Al–Cu alloy matrix composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased microhardness of the Cu-NbC composites over than that of pure copper may be due to the composites' incorporation of NbC hard phase. In a metal matrix composite material, the reinforcement phase prevents plastic deformation by blocking the dislocation movement in the matrix phase under mechanical loading [29,30]. In Cu-NbC composite, the copper matrix was first deformed upon applying the load, whilst NbC acted as obstacles to the moving dislocations in the copper matrix, leading to an increase in microhardness of the composite.…”
Section: Effect Of Nbc Volume Fraction On Microhardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased microhardness of the Cu-NbC composites over than that of pure copper may be due to the composites' incorporation of NbC hard phase. In a metal matrix composite material, the reinforcement phase prevents plastic deformation by blocking the dislocation movement in the matrix phase under mechanical loading [29,30]. In Cu-NbC composite, the copper matrix was first deformed upon applying the load, whilst NbC acted as obstacles to the moving dislocations in the copper matrix, leading to an increase in microhardness of the composite.…”
Section: Effect Of Nbc Volume Fraction On Microhardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as the samples were subjected to the rapid heating and cooling in the consolidation processing by the SPS method, thermally activated dislocations are created due to the CTE mismatch between metallic matrix (Cu; 6.6 × 10 −6 1/°C) and nanoceramic (NbC; 17.1 × 10 −6 1/°C). Furthermore, the reinforcing agent hinders the plastic deformation by pinning the dislocation movement in the matrix phase (Orowan model) 29,30 . Once the Cu–NbC nanocomposite is loaded, the copper matrix deforms first, while the NbC nanoparticles act as obstacles to pin the dislocations in the copper matrix, forming the dislocation pile‐ups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the reinforcing agent hinders the plastic deformation by pinning the dislocation movement in the matrix phase (Orowan model). 29,30 Once the Cu-NbC nanocomposite is loaded, the copper matrix deforms first, while the NbC nanoparticles act as obstacles to pin the dislocations in the copper matrix, forming the dislocation pile-ups. Higher concentrations of NbC reinforcement enhance the resistance to the movement of dislocations, leading to an increase in the strength of the nanocomposite.…”
Section: Preparation Of Cu-nbc Nanocomposite and Evaluation Of Mechan...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ synthesis has been extensively utilized to produce particle-reinforced metals for strong interfacial contact between the reinforcement and the Al matrix, effective control of the size of the in situ particles as well as the level of reinforcement, which yields better tailorability of the properties [5]. One commonly adopted in situ method involves a reaction between Al and a metal oxide, such as CuO [6], Fe 2 O 3 [7], Ti 2 O [8] and ZnO [9], to produce Al 2 O 3 particle reinforcements. CuO is one of the most widely used metal oxides because fine in situ Al 2 O 3 particles can be successfully synthesized in the Al/CuO systems and the reduced Cu can react with Al to form intermetallic phases that can act as reinforcements in the composite matrix [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%