“…The performance of the g-C 3 N 4 as the photocatalyst in the reduction of the charging potential of the Li-ion oxygen battery was extraordinary . Indeed, g-C 3 N 4 , a nonmetallic semiconductor, has been explored extensively as a visible-light-active photocatalyst since it is well known with a relatively small band gap, cost efficiency, and thermal and chemical stabilities. − The poor electrical conductivity and the severe recombination of the photogenerated electron–hole pairs, however, limit the large-scale applications of g-C 3 N 4 The synthesis of g-C 3 N 4 -based nanocomposites is accepted as the main strategy to eliminate these handicaps and improve the visible light absorption performance of g-C 3 N 4 . − Especially due to the similar carbon network and sp 2 -conjugated π structure, graphene and g-C 3 N 4 are considered to be the most compatible materials to form nanocomposites. ,,− The reduced graphene oxide (rGO) has an additional advantage over graphene or doped graphene due to the presence of oxygen-rich active sites on it since these active sites result in the formation of novel covalent bonds in the nanocomposites. ,, It is reported that the band gap, CB edge potential, and thus the valance band (VB) edge potential of g-C 3 N 4 can be tuned effectively by intercalation of various amounts of the rGO. , More specifically, the narrowed band gap due to the red shift of the absorption band edges, the positively shifted VB edge potential, and the enhanced electronic conductivity cause the improved photocatalytic activity to better utilize visible light and increase the oxidation power upon the synthesis of the g-C 3 N 4 /rGO nanocomposites. , The red shift of the absorption band edges was also reported in TiO 2 /rGO nanocomposites …”