2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced performance of Dark-Nets for brain tumor classification and segmentation using colormap-based superpixel techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed from Table 6 that the proposed brain tumor detection method achieves a superior performance with M-SVM classification. [28] VGG19 & image augmentation 94.58% Gumaei et al [31] Regularized Extreme Learning MAchine 94.23% Swati et al [32] Fine-tuned VGG19 94.82% Kumar et al [33] ResNet50 & Global Average Pooling 97.48% Cheng et al [48] Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) 93.60% Badza et al [49] CNN 96.50% Tripathi et al [50] SVM 94.63% Ahuja et al [51] DarkNet-53 98.15% Noreen et al [52] InceptionV3 & ensemble of KNN, SVM & RF 94.34% Bodapati et al [53] Two channel DNN 97.23% Anaraki et al [54] CNN & Genetic Algorithm 94.20% Deepak et al [55] GoogleNet 97.10% Proposed Method 17-layered CNN, MobileNetV2 & M-SVM 98.92%…”
Section: Figshare Dataset Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be observed from Table 6 that the proposed brain tumor detection method achieves a superior performance with M-SVM classification. [28] VGG19 & image augmentation 94.58% Gumaei et al [31] Regularized Extreme Learning MAchine 94.23% Swati et al [32] Fine-tuned VGG19 94.82% Kumar et al [33] ResNet50 & Global Average Pooling 97.48% Cheng et al [48] Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) 93.60% Badza et al [49] CNN 96.50% Tripathi et al [50] SVM 94.63% Ahuja et al [51] DarkNet-53 98.15% Noreen et al [52] InceptionV3 & ensemble of KNN, SVM & RF 94.34% Bodapati et al [53] Two channel DNN 97.23% Anaraki et al [54] CNN & Genetic Algorithm 94.20% Deepak et al [55] GoogleNet 97.10% Proposed Method 17-layered CNN, MobileNetV2 & M-SVM 98.92%…”
Section: Figshare Dataset Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a limited number of labeled datasets in the field of medical imaging. To solve this problem, data augmentation methods aiming to reproduce the data synthetically are used [48,49]. Therefore, in order to avoid the above-mentioned problems, in the preprocessing stage, original X-ray images were synthetically augmented by rotation, scaling and mirroring methods from geometric transformation-based data augmentation techniques [50].…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlighted the salient feature information and empowered the network to eliminate noisy and irrelevant feature responses. Sakshi et al 35 utilized pre‐trained DarkNets to classify T1WCE MRI images into the tumor and non‐tumor classes. Aboelenein et al 36 proposed a Hybrid Two‐Track U‐Net (HTTU‐Net) for segmenting the tumor cells of the brain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%