2019
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201902165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Performance and Stability of TiO2‐Nanoparticles‐Based Perovskite Solar Cells Employing a Cheap Polymeric Surface Modifier

Abstract: Interface engineering of TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs)‐based perovskite solar cells (PVSCs) is often necessary to facilitate the extraction and transport of charge carriers. In this work, poly[{9,9‐bis[3′‐(N,N‐dimethyl)propyl]‐2,7‐fluorene}‐alt‐2,7‐(9,9‐dioctylfluorene)] (PFN) and polystyrene (PS) are demonstrated to be effective surface modifiers of the TiO2 NPs electron‐transporting layer in n‐i‐p PVSCs. The low‐cost insulating polymer PS performs better than the PFN conjugated polymer owing to its high film qual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no doubt that 50 nm polymeric HTLs endow much effective protection for perovskite than 150 nm doped spiro‐OMeTAD HTL. [ 67,68 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no doubt that 50 nm polymeric HTLs endow much effective protection for perovskite than 150 nm doped spiro‐OMeTAD HTL. [ 67,68 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18.0 21.62 1.11 2019 [28] PFPT3 Upper interface FAPbI 3 22.0 24.34 1.13 2021 [29] PFN-OX Bottom interface MAPbI 3 15.5 20.2 1.02 2015 [30] PFN-2TNDI Upper interface MAPbI 3− x Cl x 16.7 21.9 0.98 2016 [31] PFN Bottom interface MAPbI 3 19.1 21.23 1.11 2017 [32] PPDI-F3N Bottom interface MAPbI 3 18.3 22.8 1.09 2017 [33] F-N2200 Antisolvent MAPbI 3 18.4 22.7 1.06 2018 [34] PF-1 Antisolvent MAPbI 3 18.7 22.8 1.08 2018 [34] DPP-DTT Antisolvent CsPbI 2 Br 15.1 15.02 1.29 2019 [35] PBTI Antisolvent CsFAMA-3 c) 20.7 22.91 1.13 2019 [36] PD-10-DTTE-7 Upper interface MAPbI 3 18.8 23.30 1.03 2019 [37] PS Bottom interface CsFAMA-2 17.1 23.55 1.18 2019 [38] MPS6-TMA Bottom interface CsFAMA-4 d)…”
Section: Defect Passivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal thickness of HTLs is about 50 nm, while that of doped spiro-OMeTAD is always higher than 150 nm. 51 The J – V curves of the devices with different HTMs tested under forward and reverse scanning directions are shown in Fig. 4b, and the photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%