2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced performance and electrocatalytic kinetics of Ni-Mo/graphene nanocatalysts towards alkaline urea oxidation reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Figure S4, the CuCo 2 O 4 electrode showed almost no change in potential during CV measurements at various scan rates, indicating superior rate capability for the UOR process. Tests performed by Shi et al demonstrated an increase in the anodic current density for the Ni/Mo/graphene nanocatalysts after addition of urea in the system [26]. This increase was also found by Barakat et al in the urea oxidation test for Ni and Mn nanoparticle-decorated carbon nanofibers [27].…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Activitiessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As seen in Figure S4, the CuCo 2 O 4 electrode showed almost no change in potential during CV measurements at various scan rates, indicating superior rate capability for the UOR process. Tests performed by Shi et al demonstrated an increase in the anodic current density for the Ni/Mo/graphene nanocatalysts after addition of urea in the system [26]. This increase was also found by Barakat et al in the urea oxidation test for Ni and Mn nanoparticle-decorated carbon nanofibers [27].…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Activitiessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Figure D reveals the Tafel slopes of UOR on Ni−Co−Se and Ni−Co−Se/CNT in the kinetic domain from 0.2 V to 0.28 V. The corresponding slopes were measured to be 87.2 mV/dec and 61.3 mV/dec, respectively. Such Tafel slope of CNT/Ni−Co−Se catalyst is lower than those of Ni 8 Mo 1 /G (110 mV/dec), MnO 2 nanocrystals (75 mV/dec), NiCo LDH‐NO 3 (91 mV/dec), NiO/MWCNTs (85.35 mV/dec), and NiO/Gr (90.87 mV/dec) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, the kinetics of UOR at the as‐obtained catalysts were studied by the Tafel plots (Figure S8, Supporting Information). It can be seen that the Tafel slope of the C@Ni 2 P NRs‐peapod catalyst was estimated to be 74.28 mV dec −1 , which is much smaller than that of C@Ni 2 P NPs (128.90 mV dec −1 ) and marginally less than those reported for Ni 8 Mo 1 (110 mV dec −1 ), NiCo layer double hydroxide with nitrate intercalant (NiCo LDH‐NO 3 ) (91 mV dec −1 ), Ni(OH) 2 ultrathin nanomeshes (NMs) (80 mV dec −1 ), Ni(OH) 2 ‐NPs (231 mV dec −1 ), NiO/multi‐walled carbon nanotubes (NiO/MWCNTs) (85.35 mV dec −1 ), NiO/Gr (90.87 mV dec −1 ), Ni 1 Mo 1 /Gr (160 mV dec −1 ), Ni 4 Mo 1 /Gr (139 mV dec −1 ), and Ni 3 Mo 2 /Gr (137 mV dec −1 ), implying faster reaction kinetics at C@Ni 2 P NRs‐peapod.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%