2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.85.023414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced nonlinear response of Ne8+to intense ultrafast x rays

Abstract: We investigate the possible reasons for the discrepancy between the theoretical two-photon ionization cross section, ∼10 −56 cm 4 s, of Ne 8+ obtained within the perturbative nonrelativistic framework for monochromatic light [S. Novikov and A. Hopersky, J. Phys. B 34, 4857 (2001)] and the experimental value, 7 × 10 −54 cm 4 s, reported in [G. Doumy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 083002 (2011)] at a photon energy of 1110 eV. To this end, we consider Ne 8+ exposed to deterministic and chaotic ensembles of intense… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that He experiments were performed above the onephoton threshold where it competes with two-photon double ionization. The He-like Ne results were also measured far from the two-photon threshold, and the relative difference from perturbative scaling was attributed to the contributions from near-resonant states [14]. In the current work on Zr, the upper (lower) limit of the cross section is about 23 (1.3) times higher than the Z −6 scaled results for Z = 40.…”
Section: Absorption Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that He experiments were performed above the onephoton threshold where it competes with two-photon double ionization. The He-like Ne results were also measured far from the two-photon threshold, and the relative difference from perturbative scaling was attributed to the contributions from near-resonant states [14]. In the current work on Zr, the upper (lower) limit of the cross section is about 23 (1.3) times higher than the Z −6 scaled results for Z = 40.…”
Section: Absorption Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The results were found to be 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than both the nonresonant perturbative scaling of Ref. [11] and the second-order perturbation theory calculations of Novikov and Hopersky [13], and were attributed to contributions from near-resonant states [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Firstly, xatom has served as an essential toolkit for various XFEL experiments on gas-phase atoms [14,39,40,41,42] conducted at LCLS [43] and at SACLA [44]. It has provided capabilities to interpret experimental data, to examine nonlinear two-photon x-ray ionization [14,45], and to propose a novel x-ray ionization mechanism involving resonant excitations and accompanying decays [39,41]. The noble gas results obtained by xatom have been used to calibrate x-ray beam profiles [39,40,46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated that all electrons from light elements like neon or nitrogen can be stripped in a single pulse provided the photon energy is higher than all ionization potentials of the intermediate ionic states. The rate of direct ("nonsequential") two-photon ionization has been shown to be small [6,7] and its contribution to the total ionization yield can be neglected whenever sequential ionization is energetically allowed. Also, hidden resonant excitations were unveiled in high charge states of neon [8], but their role in the overall photoionization process is negligible for light atoms as they appear very localized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%