15th Dynamics Specialists Conference 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-1794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Modal Approach for Free-flight Nonlinear Aeroelastic Simulation of Very Flexible Aircraft

Abstract: A recently proposed modal-based method that captures the geometric nonlinear effects in the regime of large deformations is applied to the modeling of University of Michigan's X-HALE UAV. The method is an extension of the classical modal approach towards large geometric deflections and uses higher-order stiffness terms and mode components to account for nonlinear force-displacement relationships and geometrically nonlinear displacement fields. In this paper, the method is further extended to enable rigid body … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Separate research group efforts have developed aeroelastic framework capable of taking into account the nonlinear aspects of the VFA behavior. Examples of state of the art codes in this context cited on literature are UM/NAST (17,18,19) from University of Michigan, SHARPy (20,21,22,23) from London Imperial College, ASWING (24,25,26) from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, NATASHA (27,28) , from Georgia Institute of Technology, and DLR toolbox (29,30) , from Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR).…”
Section: Propeller Modeling On Nonlinear Aeroelastic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Separate research group efforts have developed aeroelastic framework capable of taking into account the nonlinear aspects of the VFA behavior. Examples of state of the art codes in this context cited on literature are UM/NAST (17,18,19) from University of Michigan, SHARPy (20,21,22,23) from London Imperial College, ASWING (24,25,26) from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, NATASHA (27,28) , from Georgia Institute of Technology, and DLR toolbox (29,30) , from Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR).…”
Section: Propeller Modeling On Nonlinear Aeroelastic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to capture the interaction of propellers and aircraft lifting surfaces, a method capable of taking into account that mutual aerodynamic influence was necessary. For that purpose, the Unsteady Vortex Lattice method (UVLM) was selected, and a UVLM code developed by Ritter (43) was adapted and integrated to UM/NAST framework, as an additional aerodynamic option.…”
Section: Lifting Surfaces Aerodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core module coupling MSC Nastran SOL 400 with the VLM code is validated by analyzing the nonlinear aeroelastic static response of a highly flexible 16 m wing [23] and of the X-HALE risk reduction vehicle (RRV) [24] at a prescribed freestream velocity and angle of attack. The analyses are performed by assuming clamped boundary conditions at the root for the wing and at the wing centerline for the X-HALE.…”
Section: A Validation Of Nonlinear Aeroelastic Static Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference grid defining the support frame is chosen at the wing centerline in order to directly compare the trim deflection with the results from UM/NAST and the DLR toolbox. The analysis is performed using a step size equal to 20% [24], for which the solution converges 10% faster than with no relaxation.…”
Section: X-hale Rrvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their works, they propose a series of nonlinear static finite element analyses to obtain the quadratic mode shape components. Ritter uses this idea for simulating the nonlinear aeroelastic gust responses of free-flying aircraft in [19]. Van Zyl seized upon the subject of quadratic mode shape components for T-tail flutter studies and proposes a method for computing the quadratic mode shape components based on linear finite element analyses [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%