2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.05.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced mechanical properties of friction stir welded dissimilar Al–Cu joint by intermetallic compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
129
4
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
129
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to counteract the difference in flow stress and melting temperature between the two materials, the tool is usually shifted towards the aluminium. Xue et al [27] recommend that no active stirring between Al and Cu takes places, only leaving a small diffusion layer of approximately 3 µm which contributes to the joint strength. Otherwise, large copper particles and fragments are pulled into the stirring zone, which results in significant void and IMC formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to counteract the difference in flow stress and melting temperature between the two materials, the tool is usually shifted towards the aluminium. Xue et al [27] recommend that no active stirring between Al and Cu takes places, only leaving a small diffusion layer of approximately 3 µm which contributes to the joint strength. Otherwise, large copper particles and fragments are pulled into the stirring zone, which results in significant void and IMC formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta técnica permitió la obtención de juntas soldadas con unión metalúrgica y ductilidad adecuada, gracias a la formación de una capa fina y homogénea de CIM, con espesor entre 5 y 10 μm (Zhang et al, 2009;Cao et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2013). Este resultado coincide con la afirmación de algunos autores que sostienen que es necesaria la formación de una capa fina de CIM que garantice la unión metalúrgica de ambos materiales, con un espesor tal que no comprometa substancialmente la ductilidad (Xue, et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In tensile test, the fracture occurred in the interface at 52.5 MPa. That means the intermetallic compound that supposed to play the ro le o f the bonding is very brittle and has tensile strength lower than the tensile strength of the stirring zone and HAZ [ 8]. Fig.…”
Section: Sem Examinationmentioning
confidence: 98%