2020
DOI: 10.1002/admt.201900970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Low‐Frequency Monopole and Dipole Acoustic Antennas Based on a Subwavelength Bianisotropic Structure

Abstract: BHMR sample and verify the enhanced monopole and dipole acoustic antennas experimentally.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are so many loudspeakers, and their sound control has reached perfection, although their size is usually much smaller than the wavelength. However, there are still few works on the influence of the environment on the emission of acoustic waves in the aspect in which is relevant for electromagnetic waves [212][213][214], although this is very important for the creation of effective small-sized sources of low-frequency sound.…”
Section: Acoustic Wave Emittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are so many loudspeakers, and their sound control has reached perfection, although their size is usually much smaller than the wavelength. However, there are still few works on the influence of the environment on the emission of acoustic waves in the aspect in which is relevant for electromagnetic waves [212][213][214], although this is very important for the creation of effective small-sized sources of low-frequency sound.…”
Section: Acoustic Wave Emittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54c, the agreement between theory and experiment is good, and that is not surprising, since losses in the system are small, and acoustic waves are scalar. A study of a similar system with more complicated geometry was carried out in [213], where high values of the Purcell factor were also predicted.…”
Section: Acoustic Wave Emittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22,23] However, most acoustic metamaterials are designed in a way that makes it challenging for them to have a direct and immediate impact on real-world applications pertaining to the audio industry, with one possible exception being sound absorption. [24] On the one hand, despite the reduction of audio distortion [25] realized by the mitigation of high-frequency acoustical cavity-resonances through the addition of acoustic metamaterial-based absorbers in loudspeaker enclosures, the attempt to incorporate passive acoustic metamaterials [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] into the loudspeaker designs has seen very limited radiation enhancement at low frequencies due to the bulky size and the lack of consideration on the metamaterial-transducer coupling. On the other hand, though active acoustic metamaterial may offer a solution to a broadband radiation enhancement, [34] they often involve designs that are complicated to avoid instability and also require more power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full control of the phase change along the metasurface requires a very dense array of fine elements. Furthermore, the complex and fine internal geometries of these structures are hard to scale down to higher frequencies, and could induce significant losses in the acoustic thermal and viscous boundary layers near the walls of the structure (25,26). This typical gradient metasurface approach suffers from higher order effects due to the impedance mismatch between incident and scattered waves for large steering angles (13,27), which results in low focusing efficiency for lenses with large numerical aperture (28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%