2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2019.2924970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Linear Iterative Detector for Massive Multiuser MIMO Uplink

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design in [42] implements a parallel Gauss-Seidel (PGS) algorithm that iteratively solves an L-MMSE data detection problem for frequency-flat channels. In Table I, we also include two of the most recent, state-of-the-art linear detectors for massive MU-MIMO systems, proposed in [27] and [43]. The design presented in [27], implements a recursive conjugate-gradient-based L-MMSE detector, called RCG, and the design in [43] implements an algorithm based on steepest descent and Barzilai-Borwein algorithms, abbreviated to ES-DBB, that solves the L-MMSE detection problem iteratively.…”
Section: E Implementation Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The design in [42] implements a parallel Gauss-Seidel (PGS) algorithm that iteratively solves an L-MMSE data detection problem for frequency-flat channels. In Table I, we also include two of the most recent, state-of-the-art linear detectors for massive MU-MIMO systems, proposed in [27] and [43]. The design presented in [27], implements a recursive conjugate-gradient-based L-MMSE detector, called RCG, and the design in [43] implements an algorithm based on steepest descent and Barzilai-Borwein algorithms, abbreviated to ES-DBB, that solves the L-MMSE detection problem iteratively.…”
Section: E Implementation Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in Table I, we scale the reported throughput of these reference designs by a factor of 4/6 so that the throughput of all designs is with respect to 16-QAM. We include the throughput for ESDBB as it was reported in [43], since the modulation scheme was not specified for that design. We note that PGS, NS-SCFDMA and RCG designs contain hardware to compute post-equalization signalto-noise-plus-interference ratio (SINR) and log-likelihood ratios (LLRs), which is not present in our design.…”
Section: E Implementation Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The received signal vector, boldyCNB×1, at the base station is represented as 21 boldy=boldHs+boldn. Here, boldsψNU×1 is the transmitted symbol vector and ψ is the constellation set of square M‐QAM defined as 20,33 ψ={}ψr+jψi|ψr,ψiEsnormalГNU()M+1,,1,1,M1 where M, Es, and Г=2()M13 represents the constellation size, total transmitted power and average symbol power, respectively. The covariance matrix of bolds is Rss=E[]boldssH=EsNUINU.…”
Section: Mu‐mimo Uplink Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an approximate inverse is computed by Shafivulla et al 19 based on Cayley–Hamilton theorem 19 . Further, to improve the performance of constrained descent search (CDS) detector, symmetric successive over relaxation (SSOR)‐based pre‐conditioner is introduced by Zhang et al 20 Also, a novel enhanced iterative detector based on steepest descent (SD) and Barzilai–Borwein (BB) algorithms is proposed by Tan et al 21 However, when the number of active users scales up and the total number of transmitting antennas becomes close to the number of base station antennas, that is, as β approaches unity, the iterative methods suffers from slow convergence rate. Under this scenario, decomposition algorithms like Cholesky and QR are preferred to compute the pseudo‐inverse of channel matrix 22–24…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the ML detection is prohibited in largescale MIMO networks. In contrast, linear detectors are simpler than the ML detectors but they involve an unfavourable computation of a matrix inversion and multiplications [78]. It is well known that the matrix inversion complexity of linear detectors is O K 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%