2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02909692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced late blight resistance of transgenic potato expressing glucose oxidase under the control of pathogen-inducible promoter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include typical regulatory elements such as CAAT and TATA boxes, a TATTCT box that is responsive to light, a tissue-specific expression element TGHAAARK, an ACGTG responsive to dehydration and dark, a TACGTGTC responsive to ABA, a TGACG responsive to jasmonic acid, SAR-binding domains MarAbox1 (AATAAAYAAA), MarTbox (TTWTWTTWTT), and 5'-UTR (Py-rich) (Lu et al 2009;Graeber et al 2010). Also detected were elements involved in disease resistance and SA induction: the disease-resistance elements TGTCA, GAAAAA (GT1-motif), and TGAC; the SAinduction elements TGACG (AS-1 element) and GRWAAW; W-Box elements (TTGAC, TGACT, TGACY) responsive to both pathogen and SA; and a TTTGACY element (WB-box) responsive to an elicitor (Somssich, 1994;Zhen et al, 2000;Kundu et al, 2011;Maita et al, 2015). The various GUS mRNA levels generated by the different promoters (Figures 6 and 7) lead us to speculate that the high level of expression associated with P 2 might be related to its AS-1 element.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include typical regulatory elements such as CAAT and TATA boxes, a TATTCT box that is responsive to light, a tissue-specific expression element TGHAAARK, an ACGTG responsive to dehydration and dark, a TACGTGTC responsive to ABA, a TGACG responsive to jasmonic acid, SAR-binding domains MarAbox1 (AATAAAYAAA), MarTbox (TTWTWTTWTT), and 5'-UTR (Py-rich) (Lu et al 2009;Graeber et al 2010). Also detected were elements involved in disease resistance and SA induction: the disease-resistance elements TGTCA, GAAAAA (GT1-motif), and TGAC; the SAinduction elements TGACG (AS-1 element) and GRWAAW; W-Box elements (TTGAC, TGACT, TGACY) responsive to both pathogen and SA; and a TTTGACY element (WB-box) responsive to an elicitor (Somssich, 1994;Zhen et al, 2000;Kundu et al, 2011;Maita et al, 2015). The various GUS mRNA levels generated by the different promoters (Figures 6 and 7) lead us to speculate that the high level of expression associated with P 2 might be related to its AS-1 element.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of CRISPR/Cas9 technology provides a new approach to address this problem, and this technology has worked to achieve resistance to pathogens in various crops [ 49 51 ]; however, to reduce the negative effects of a transgene on the whole plant, the most efficient way to confer resistance is to restrict its expression only to infected cells. Pathogen-induced promoters are unique and valuable tools for engineering resistance to plant disease [ 52 , 53 ]. Therefore, integration of the CRISPR/Cas9 system and pathogen-induced promoters (pol II promoter) to develop a pathogen-inducible gene editing system is of great significance for devising pyrethrum resistance to S. tanaceti , as this method can restrict gene editing only to infected cells and reduce metabolic disruption caused by gene editing, thus minimizing the impact on plant growth and development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting constructs were designated as pBI-Pat, pBI-GBSS, pBI-Ubi, and pBI-Lhca ( Figure 1) and were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL0. them, such as cold-or pathogen-inducible promoters, have been isolated from the potato genome [27,28]. The aim of this work was to test and compare the efficacy of several potato-derived promoters with an aim to apply them in various functional and applied studies.…”
Section: Plasmid Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, other environmentally inducible promoters with different levels of activity might be adopted to minimize the adverse effects. However, the practical use of inducible promoters is strictly limited, since only a few of them, such as cold- or pathogen-inducible promoters, have been isolated from the potato genome [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%