2017
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b12236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Isolation and Release of Circulating Tumor Cells Using Nanoparticle Binding and Ligand Exchange in a Microfluidic Chip

Abstract: The detection of rare circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the blood of cancer patients has the potential to be a powerful and noninvasive method for examining metastasis, evaluating prognosis, assessing tumor sensitivity to drugs, and monitoring therapeutic outcomes. In this study, we have developed an efficient strategy to isolate CTCs from the blood of breast cancer patients using a microfluidic immune-affinity approach. Additionally, to gain further access to these rare cells for downstream characterization, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
184
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
184
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to capture and analyze CTCs among a billion normal blood cells, multiple isolation methods have been developed, which generally utilize differences among cell physical properties or surface biomarkers of cancer cells . Several technology platforms have been developed, which involve microfluidic devices that enhance cell‐surface contact, immunomagnetic beads based on capture biomolecules immobilized on beads, several functionalized nanostructured surfaces based on cell‐substrate affinity, and microfilter devices for isolating tumor cells based on the different sizes . However, most of the aforementioned CTCs capture and isolation methods have some drawbacks and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to capture and analyze CTCs among a billion normal blood cells, multiple isolation methods have been developed, which generally utilize differences among cell physical properties or surface biomarkers of cancer cells . Several technology platforms have been developed, which involve microfluidic devices that enhance cell‐surface contact, immunomagnetic beads based on capture biomolecules immobilized on beads, several functionalized nanostructured surfaces based on cell‐substrate affinity, and microfilter devices for isolating tumor cells based on the different sizes . However, most of the aforementioned CTCs capture and isolation methods have some drawbacks and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the aptamer-modified AuNP surface acts as ar ough interface to enhance local topographic interactions. [14] Moreover, AuNPs can protect DNAp robes from nuclease degradation, [15] improving the stability of aptamers.Finally,the Au À Sbond can be readily disrupted by excess biocompatible thiol molecules,w ithout compromising cell viability, [16] thereby enabling effective release for further analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The facile and highly efficient release of captured target cells is crucial for carrying out downstream profiling of CTCs. As shown in Figure S4 (Supporting Information), the captured cells could be released with an efficiency as high as 99 ± 0.0% ( n = 3), which is a difficult standard for many antibody‐based methods to meet and/or is reached only through use of complex designs . The high cell‐release efficiency of the PBA‐CIH could be attributed to the noncovalent interaction with the cells made possible by the microinterfaces of the imprinted sites and the reversible affinity fostered by the molecular recognition between the 3‐AAPBA on the hydrogel and the glycans on the cell surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%