2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00146-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced hyperspectral tomography for bioimaging by spatiospectral reconstruction

Abstract: Here we apply hyperspectral bright field imaging to collect computed tomographic images with excellent energy resolution (~ 1 keV), applying it for the first time to map the distribution of stain in a fixed biological sample through its characteristic K-edge. Conventionally, because the photons detected at each pixel are distributed across as many as 200 energy channels, energy-selective images are characterised by low count-rates and poor signal-to-noise ratio. This means high X-ray exposures, long scan times… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is not always the case, for instance, if there is no prior knowledge of the sample composition, or low chemical concentration and the sample deposits are on the order of detector voxel size. In such cases, K-edges may be completely concealed by the background noise of a channelwise FBP reconstruction as shown in [ 6 ]. Hence, we need to rely on a more sophisticated reconstruction that has the ability to suppress noise in both the spatial and spectral domains and confidently identify and quantify the elemental distribution of each material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this is not always the case, for instance, if there is no prior knowledge of the sample composition, or low chemical concentration and the sample deposits are on the order of detector voxel size. In such cases, K-edges may be completely concealed by the background noise of a channelwise FBP reconstruction as shown in [ 6 ]. Hence, we need to rely on a more sophisticated reconstruction that has the ability to suppress noise in both the spatial and spectral domains and confidently identify and quantify the elemental distribution of each material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly important when looking to perform further spectral analyses, such as the use of K-edge subtraction (KES), where we segment elemental phases based on identification of their K-edges. For a detailed task-based reconstruction quality assessment based on KES analysis, we refer the reader to [ 6 ], where we compare more advanced spatio-spectral reconstruction methods for a biological sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quality of the computed reconstructions is assessed by visual inspection combined with contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The CNR metric is used for evaluating the image contrast and noise properties for a selected region of interest (ROI) [22]. We use the method proposed by Bian et al [23] where a ROI with low-contrast structure is compared to a background ROI while taking the standard deviations of both the signal and background ROIs into account.…”
Section: Error Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dataset: All the files of this study are freely available and can be downloaded from [22]. It contains a) 4D hyperspectral (energy-resolved) X-ray CT projection data, b) flat-field data, c) energy in keV for every energy bin and d) the cone-geometry setup.…”
Section: Case Study Iii: Hyperspectral Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%