2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction over molybdenum carbide nanoparticles confined inside single-walled carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For SWNTs and the FeK/SWNTs catalyst, the isotherms show a distinct increase at relative pressure ( P / P 0 ) of 0–0.1 and a hysteresis loop in a high P / P 0 range of 0.85 to 1 (Figure a). The former is ascribed to the filling of the microchannels in SWNTs, while the latter is originated from the stacking pores of SWNTs . As seen in Figure b, SWNTs and the FeK/SWNTs catalyst display a bimodal pore size distribution peaked at 0.47 and 0.72 nm with the former being predominant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For SWNTs and the FeK/SWNTs catalyst, the isotherms show a distinct increase at relative pressure ( P / P 0 ) of 0–0.1 and a hysteresis loop in a high P / P 0 range of 0.85 to 1 (Figure a). The former is ascribed to the filling of the microchannels in SWNTs, while the latter is originated from the stacking pores of SWNTs . As seen in Figure b, SWNTs and the FeK/SWNTs catalyst display a bimodal pore size distribution peaked at 0.47 and 0.72 nm with the former being predominant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The former is ascribed to the filling of the microchannels in SWNTs, while the latter is originated from the stacking pores of SWNTs. 26 As seen in Figure 1b, SWNTs and the FeK/ SWNTs catalyst display a bimodal pore size distribution peaked at 0.47 and 0.72 nm with the former being predominant. These micropore sizes are characteristic of zigzagged SWNTs with C 36 structure and (n,m) value of (6,0) with the theoretical tube diameter of 0.47 nm (d = 0.246(n 2 + m 2 + nm) 1/2 /π nm) 27 and SWNTs with C 60 structure with the theoretical diameter of ∼0.7 nm, 28 respectively.…”
Section: T H I S C O N T E N T I S O N L Y L I C E N S E D F O R C O ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8] Currently, iridium (Ir) and ruthenium (Ru) are the most efficient electrocatalysts for OER, platinum (Pt) for the ORR, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] however, their high cost and scarce resources have hindered their large-scale application. [16][17][18][19][20] Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop low-cost, efficient, and durable for ORR and OER. In response, various types of materials, especially transition metal-based catalysts as alternatives, have been extensively studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By keeping the aforementioned issues in view, enormous efforts are devoted towards designing alternative catalysts with earth abundance, cost-effective and superior activity over the past several decades including transition metal oxides [7,8], sulfides [9,10], carbides [11,12], nitrides [13,14], borides [15,16], phosphides [17,18] and metal-free catalyst [19,20], which can overcome the economical limitations and stability issues. Additionally, some noble metals (e.g., Pd, Ru) are also used to trigger the HER kinetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%