“…When a nanoparticle (NP) is embedded in a polymer network, its dynamics can slow down dramatically. , Understanding what factors govern this slowing down is of primary importance in many fields, such as material science ( e.g., with application to thin films − and polymer-based sensors ,, ), biophysics, − and medicine, in particular for applications in drug delivery. ,, Although in recent years the diffusion of NPs in polymer solutions and melts has been the subject of numerous theoretical − and simulation studies, − only few investigations have dealt with the problem of NP diffusion in permanently cross-linked networks, despite its importance in many applications. − In some of the earliest simulation studies, this network was simply modeled as an array of fixed obstacles, which is clearly a far cry from a physically realistic description. Other authors have included connectivity and flexibility in the network model, but most of them considered only regular structures, in which the cross-links are placed at the vertices of a regular lattice and connected either by chain segments ,, or directly by springs. − , In the latter case, because there is no actual strand connecting the cross-links, strand dynamics and entanglement effects are not accounted for. Moreover, real-life networks, such as hydrogels, vulcanized rubbers, or networks produced by electron irradiation, are often disordered and polydisperse, with a continuous distribution of strand lengths, properties that lead to an additional complexity in the dynamics of the NPs.…”