2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-08229-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced growth after extreme wetness compensates for post-drought carbon loss in dry forests

Abstract: While many studies have reported that drought events have substantial negative legacy effects on forest growth, it remains unclear whether wetness events conversely have positive growth legacy effects. Here, we report pervasive and substantial growth enhancement after extreme wetness by examining tree radial growth at 1929 forest sites, satellite-derived vegetation greenness, and land surface model simulations. Enhanced growth after extreme wetness lasts for 1 to 5 years and compensates for 93 ± 8% of the grow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(67 reference statements)
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along this, low SPEI values can have reduced effects on growth if local microclimate or site conditions mitigate drought impact (Jiang et al, 2019). Further, other confounding factors besides drought can cause abrupt growth reductions as is the case of pest outbreaks or pathogens (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along this, low SPEI values can have reduced effects on growth if local microclimate or site conditions mitigate drought impact (Jiang et al, 2019). Further, other confounding factors besides drought can cause abrupt growth reductions as is the case of pest outbreaks or pathogens (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic impact of LUCC on annual GPPrs and ETrs can be isolated by using the difference of the two modeling experiments (Jiang et al, 2019). To quantify the LUCC impact on GPP and ETrs at each grid cell, this study calculates the difference between the two experiment outputs, which is expressed as Di=DynamiciStatici, where D i is the GPPrs or ETrs difference between the two PML‐V2 experiments, “Dynamic” means the outputs from the dynamic experiment, “Static” means the outputs from the static experiment, and i represents each grid cell.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chiba population therefore experienced more drought stress during the growing season than the Kumamoto population. This might have caused a delayed effect of drought stress in early spring at the Chiba site [60,61], which partly explains the lack of a significant growth response to drought at the Kumamoto site.…”
Section: Climate Change Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%