2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Genetic Algorithm based computation technique for multi-objective Optimal Power Flow solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
104
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various stochastic optimization techniques have been suggested and utilized to deal with OPF problems, like the genetic algorithm [11][12][13], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [2], differential evolution (DE) [14], harmony search (HS) algorithm [15], artificial bee colony algorithm [4,16], gravitational search algorithm (GSA) [17], distributed algorithm (DA) [18], and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) [19,20]. A survey of the non-deterministic search (stochastic search) algorithms utilized to solve variants of OPF is presented in [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various stochastic optimization techniques have been suggested and utilized to deal with OPF problems, like the genetic algorithm [11][12][13], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [2], differential evolution (DE) [14], harmony search (HS) algorithm [15], artificial bee colony algorithm [4,16], gravitational search algorithm (GSA) [17], distributed algorithm (DA) [18], and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) [19,20]. A survey of the non-deterministic search (stochastic search) algorithms utilized to solve variants of OPF is presented in [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key variables corresponding to the best fitness function yielded by the proposed method for case 3 are given in Appendix A. [18] 799.56 --6000 HIGA [19] 799.56 799.6497 0.0406 4560 HIGA-BM [20] 800.0435 800.122 0.0385 12,000 DE [21] 801.23 801.282 0.0663 -DE [22] 799.2891 --25,000 PSO [23] 800.41 ---EADPSO [24] 800.2276 800.2625 0.0303 12,500 BBOA [26] 799.1116 799.1985 -10,000 (15,000) ARCBBOA [27] 800.5159 800.6412 -10,000 TLBO [28] 800.7257 --25,000 ABCA [31] 800.6600 800.8715 --GWO [32] 799.5585 ---MELMA [33] 799.1821 ---MCBOA [34] 799.0353 --25,000 (45,000) MSA [35] 800 [22] 799.2891 --25,000 PSO [23] 800.41 ---EADPSO [24] 800.2276 800.2625 0.0303 12,500 BBOA [26] 799.1116 799.1985 -10,000 (15,000) ARCBBOA [27] 800.5159 800.6412 -10,000 TLBO [28] 800.7257 --25,000 ABCA [31] 800.6600 800.8715 --GWO [32] 799.5585 ---MELMA [33] 799.1821 ---MCBOA [34] 799.0353 --25,000 (45,000) MSA [35] 800 …”
Section: Case 3: Ieee-30 Bus Power Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there have been a huge number of applied methods such as the integration of improved genetic algorithm and effective decoupled quadratic load flow (IGA-EDQLF) [18], hybrid IGA with incremental power flow model (HIGA) [19], HIGA with boundary method (HIGA-BM) [20], differential evolution [21,22], conventional PSO [23], Evolving ant direction particle swarm optimization (EADPSO) [24], PSO with Pseudo-Gradient and constriction factor (PG-CF-PSO) [25], Biogeography-based optimization algorithm (BBOAA) [26] and adaptive real-coded biogeography-based optimization algorithm (ARCBBOA) [27], teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm (TLBO) [28], improved TLBO (ITLBO) [29], gravitational search algorithm (GSA) [30], Artificial bee colony algorithm (ABCA) [31], Grey wolf optimizer (GWO) [32], modified electromagnetism-like mechanism algorithm (MELMA) [33], modified Colliding Bodies Optimization algorithm (MCBOA) [34], moth swarm algorithm (MSA) [35], improved imperialist competitive algorithm (IICA) [36], cuckoo optimization algorithm (COA) [37], Gaussian bare-bones imperialist competitive algorithm (GBBICA) [38], and mathematical programming algorithm (MPA) [39]. In [18][19][20], different variants of GA have been developed in which GA has been improved first and then combined with another method for handling constraints of OPF problem. In fact, Decoupled Quadratic Load Flow has been used in [18] for dealing with OPF problem while IGA has acted as an optimization tool for searching optimal solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Optimal power flow (OPF) is one of the most important MO problems in power system. The main goal of OPF is to find the optimal adjustments of the control variables to minimize the selected objective function while satisfying various physical and operational constraints imposed by equipment and network limitations (Kumari and Maheswarapu, 2010). Since the real power generation levels and voltage magnitudes are continuous variables whereas the transformer winding ratios and shunt capacitors are discrete variables, the OPF problem is considered as a non-linear multi-modal optimization problem with a combination of the discrete and continuous variables (Abou El Ela et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%