2016
DOI: 10.1002/prop.201600074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced gauge symmetry in 6D F‐theory models and tuned elliptic Calabi‐Yau threefolds

Abstract: We systematically analyze the local combinations of gauge groups and matter that can arise in 6D F-theory models over a fixed base. We compare the low-energy constraints of anomaly cancellation to explicit F-theory constructions using Weierstrass and Tate forms, and identify some new local structures in the "swampland" of 6D supergravity and SCFT models that appear consistent from low-energy considerations but do not have known F-theory realizations. In particular, we classify and carry out a local analysis of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the theory with Dirac pairing appears to be consistent from a bottom up perspective, but so far an explicit F-theory construction has not been found [83]. The same is true for a theory with this Dirac pairing but gauge algebra su(10) ⊕ su(3) and charged hypermultiplets (10, 3) ⊕ 17(10, 1) ⊕ 2(1, 3), (3.31) In these cases, it is not yet clear whether this discrepancy represents a failure of the top down perspective or the bottom up perspective.…”
Section: Top Down Versus Bottom Upmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, the theory with Dirac pairing appears to be consistent from a bottom up perspective, but so far an explicit F-theory construction has not been found [83]. The same is true for a theory with this Dirac pairing but gauge algebra su(10) ⊕ su(3) and charged hypermultiplets (10, 3) ⊕ 17(10, 1) ⊕ 2(1, 3), (3.31) In these cases, it is not yet clear whether this discrepancy represents a failure of the top down perspective or the bottom up perspective.…”
Section: Top Down Versus Bottom Upmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A direct analysis of the related structure of K3 fibrations for many of the toric hypersurface constructions in the Kreuzer-Skarke database was carried out in [16], demonstrating directly the prevalence of fibrations by smaller-dimensional Calabi-Yau fibers among known Calabi-Yau threefolds. The study of F-theory has led to a systematic methodology for constructing and classifying elliptic Calabi-Yau threefolds [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Comparing the structure of geometries constructed in this way to the Kreuzer-Skarke database shows that at large Hodge numbers, virtually all Calabi-Yau threefolds that are known are in fact elliptic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, with the standard ordering of the 16 fiber polytopes (used in e.g. [27] and [23]), condition I holds for fibers 2,5,7,8,9,11,12,13,14,15,16; of the fibers where condition I fails, condition II holds for fibers 1, 3, 6, 10; and condition III holds for the sole remaining case, fiber 4. By simply checking these conditions for the S i for each polytope, we can ascertain whether or not there is a reflexive 2D subpolytope ∇ 2 of ∇.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a combination of methods and insights from mathematics and physics, and building on Grassi's results for minimal models of the bases that support elliptic fibrations [7], we have a good global understanding of the connected space of elliptic Calabi-Yau threefolds, the bounds on their Hodge numbers, and a systematic approach to constructing such threefolds that can be used to essentially enumerate all elliptic Calabi-Yau threefolds at large h 2,1 , though there are technical issues that make a complete enumeration at smaller values of h 2,1 currently out of reach (see e.g. [8][9][10][11][12][13]). There is a growing body of evidence that most known Calabi-Yau threefolds are in fact elliptic or genus one fibered (at least up to birational equivalence).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%