1991
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1218(91)90020-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced frequency of chromosome aberrations in workers occupationally exposed to diagnostic X-rays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The occupationally exposed individuals showed higher frequencies of dicentric and acentric chromosomes compared with the normal controls (Jha and Sharma, 1991). DNA strand breaks accumulate for quite a long time after ionizing radiation exposure, indicating the development of genetic instability and an increase in carcinogenic risk for organisms exposed to a combination of harmful environmental factors (Mikhailenko and Muzalov, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occupationally exposed individuals showed higher frequencies of dicentric and acentric chromosomes compared with the normal controls (Jha and Sharma, 1991). DNA strand breaks accumulate for quite a long time after ionizing radiation exposure, indicating the development of genetic instability and an increase in carcinogenic risk for organisms exposed to a combination of harmful environmental factors (Mikhailenko and Muzalov, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few studies that assess the genetic effects of human in vivo exposure to radiation using lymphocytes from the peripheral blood. The available data include studies carried out on individuals occupationally exposed to high doses 11,3 ; patients 27 ; people who were accidentally exposed 20,18,6,23 and persons occupationally exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation 9,13,28 . In Brazil, a large group of dentists who are not specialists in radiology deal in their offices with low doses of ionizing radiation without utilizing dosimeters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies deal with ionising radiation exposure of individuals who are chronically professionally exposed to low doses (Andreassi, 2009;Au, 1991;Carrano & Natarajan, 1988;Kassie et al, 2000). The results showed the increase in chromosomal damage during chronically low dose exposure (Barquinero et al, 1993;Boutcher, 1985;Cardoso et al, 2001;Jha, 1991;Nowak & Jankowski, 1991), but without confirmed relationship between the received dose and the intensity of DNA damage (Bolus, 2001;Coates et al, 2004;Morgan, 2003;Mothersill et al, 2000Mothersill et al, , 2001Seymour & Mothersill, 2000). The influence of chronically low dose exposure has been considered mutagenic and cancerogenic (Fachini et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%