2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.104.224105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of BCT-BZT at the morphotropic phase boundary driven by the coexistence of phases with different symmetries

Abstract: The discovery of lead-free piezoelectric materials is crucial for future information and energy storage applications. Enhanced piezoelectric and other physical properties are commonly observed near the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) composition of ferroelectric solid solutions. The (1-x)Ba(Zr 0.2 Ti 0.8 )O 3 -x(Ba 0.7 Ca 0.3 )TiO 3 (BZT-xBCT) system exhibits a large electromechanical response around its MPB region at x=0.5. We report experimental and theoretical results of BZT-xBCT over a wide composition r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, at the maximum tensile strain considered in this study, we estimate Z W = −0.72 e , Z Se = +0.36 e , and ε r = 0.035 for WSe 2 and Z W = −0.44 e , Z S = +0.22 e , and ε r = 0.016 for WS 2 . Thus, despite that these latter results appear to suggest that WSe 2 is a better piezoelectric material than WS 2 (i.e., larger piezoelectric coefficients typically are accompanied by larger Born effective charges and dielectric constants), , the total ε yy values obtained for WS 2 are larger than those obtained for WSe 2 due to the constructive addition of the electronic and ionic parts in the former system and opposing in the latter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For instance, at the maximum tensile strain considered in this study, we estimate Z W = −0.72 e , Z Se = +0.36 e , and ε r = 0.035 for WSe 2 and Z W = −0.44 e , Z S = +0.22 e , and ε r = 0.016 for WS 2 . Thus, despite that these latter results appear to suggest that WSe 2 is a better piezoelectric material than WS 2 (i.e., larger piezoelectric coefficients typically are accompanied by larger Born effective charges and dielectric constants), , the total ε yy values obtained for WS 2 are larger than those obtained for WSe 2 due to the constructive addition of the electronic and ionic parts in the former system and opposing in the latter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…1c). It is noted that large piezoelectric stress constants typically are accompanied by also large dielectric constants, 24,25 thus it is naturally difficult to find materials with large band-alignment piezo tunability ( i.e. , large α η values).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c). It is noted that large piezoelectric stress constants typically are accompanied by also large dielectric constants, 24,25 thus it is naturally difficult to nd materials with large band-alignment piezo tunability (i.e., large a h values). This small set of conditions are not only physically insightful but also computationally convenient: the relevant quantities E g , ˛and e 33 can be efficiently estimated via bulk rst-principles DFT calculations.…”
Section: Piezo-photocatalysts Bulk Modelling: the Piezoelectric Plate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, piezoelectric materials possessing energy band gaps in the range of 1.23 E g 3.0 eV (to absorb the sunlight visible radiation), small dielectric constants and large piezoelectric stress coefficients (the last two conditions as for maximizing ∆V i ), a priori should be regarded as promising piezo-photocatalysts. It is noted that large piezoelectric stress constants typically are accompanied by also large dielectric constants [24,25], thus the natural difficulty in finding materials with large band-alignment piezo tunability (i.e., large α η values). This small set of conditions are not only physically insightful but also computationally convenient: the relevant quantities E g , and e 33 can be efficiently estimated via bulk firstprinciples DFT calculations [26][27][28].…”
Section: Piezo-photocatalysts Bulk Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%