2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421365112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced expression of DNA polymerase eta contributes to cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer stem cells

Abstract: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) with enhanced tumorigenicity and chemoresistance are believed to be responsible for treatment failure and tumor relapse in ovarian cancer patients. However, it is still unclear how CSCs survive DNA-damaging agent treatment. Here, we report an elevated expression of DNA polymerase η (Pol η) in ovarian CSCs isolated from both ovarian cancer cell lines and primary tumors, indicating that CSCs may have intrinsically enhanced translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). Down-regulation of Pol η blocked… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
159
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(63 reference statements)
5
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have recently determined the NER efficiency of ovarian CSCs, defined by either CD44+CD117+ or spheroid growing in serumfree culture, after treatment with cisplatin. Surprisingly, although ovarian CSCs exhibited resistance to cisplatin treatment compared to their corresponding bulk cancer cells, no increased capability to remove cisplatin-induced DNA lesions was found in these CSCs [49] . In contrast, we revealed an elevated expression of DNA polymerase η and constitutively high levels of mono-ubiquitylated PCNA in various ovarian CSCs, indicating that enhanced TLS could be responsible for cisplatin resistance in these cells [49] .…”
Section: Activation Of Cell Cycle Checkpoint Machinerymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have recently determined the NER efficiency of ovarian CSCs, defined by either CD44+CD117+ or spheroid growing in serumfree culture, after treatment with cisplatin. Surprisingly, although ovarian CSCs exhibited resistance to cisplatin treatment compared to their corresponding bulk cancer cells, no increased capability to remove cisplatin-induced DNA lesions was found in these CSCs [49] . In contrast, we revealed an elevated expression of DNA polymerase η and constitutively high levels of mono-ubiquitylated PCNA in various ovarian CSCs, indicating that enhanced TLS could be responsible for cisplatin resistance in these cells [49] .…”
Section: Activation Of Cell Cycle Checkpoint Machinerymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Surprisingly, although ovarian CSCs exhibited resistance to cisplatin treatment compared to their corresponding bulk cancer cells, no increased capability to remove cisplatin-induced DNA lesions was found in these CSCs [49] . In contrast, we revealed an elevated expression of DNA polymerase η and constitutively high levels of mono-ubiquitylated PCNA in various ovarian CSCs, indicating that enhanced TLS could be responsible for cisplatin resistance in these cells [49] . The controversial observations of the DDR in CSCs indicate that enhanced DDR can be a contributor in been suggested to enhance the cytotoxicity of various antitumor agents [32] .…”
Section: Activation Of Cell Cycle Checkpoint Machinerymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CSCs thus implying the involvement of a Polη-mediated TLS which seems to contribute to their observed resistance in cisplatin treatment [87]. Taken together, it can be speculated that hyperthermia can influence TLS as there is evidence for the existence of interactions between…”
Section: Translesion Dna Synthesis (Tls)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Increasing evidence has shown that dysregulation of these mutagenic TLS polymerases is frequently observed in a variety of cancers and could drive genomic instability and tumorigenesis (5). Recently, it has been reported that elevated levels of TLS components could enhance DNA repair capacity, which allow cancer cells to acquire a drugresistant phenotype (6)(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%