2009
DOI: 10.1139/w09-040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced enrichment and detection of thermotolerant Campylobacter species from water using the Portable Microbe Enrichment Unit and real-time PCR

Abstract: An enhanced enrichment using the Portable Microbe Enrichment Unit (PMEU) with the microaerobic bubbling of broths was applied for the detection of thermotolerant Campylobacter species from water. This PMEU enrichment was compared with the conventional static enrichment of the international standard ISO 17995:2005. In addition, Campylobacter detection after enrichment using a real-time PCR detection was compared with colony counts. The tests with stressed Campylobacter jejuni cells in drinking water indicated t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This specific PMEU approach had been provisionally tested in a water distribution network system in Kuopio City, Finland (with 100.000 inhabitants and 350 km of pipelines) (Hakalehto et al, 2011c). Both hygienic indicators and various pathogens, such as Salmonellas, Campylobacteria, Yersinias, Staphylococci, and Bacillus cereus have been effectively monitored (Hakalehto, Pesola, Heitto, Närvänen, & Heitto, 2007;Hakalehto et al, 2009;Pitkänen et al, 2009;Mentu, Keitel, Heitto, & Hakalehto, 2009). For example, a single Salmonella cell produced a detectable signal (infrared light or ion mobility sensors or traditional medium plate confirmation) in about 10 hours (Hakalehto et al, 2011c).…”
Section: Pmeu In Water Microbiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This specific PMEU approach had been provisionally tested in a water distribution network system in Kuopio City, Finland (with 100.000 inhabitants and 350 km of pipelines) (Hakalehto et al, 2011c). Both hygienic indicators and various pathogens, such as Salmonellas, Campylobacteria, Yersinias, Staphylococci, and Bacillus cereus have been effectively monitored (Hakalehto, Pesola, Heitto, Närvänen, & Heitto, 2007;Hakalehto et al, 2009;Pitkänen et al, 2009;Mentu, Keitel, Heitto, & Hakalehto, 2009). For example, a single Salmonella cell produced a detectable signal (infrared light or ion mobility sensors or traditional medium plate confirmation) in about 10 hours (Hakalehto et al, 2011c).…”
Section: Pmeu In Water Microbiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PMEU method has earlier been validated for the detection of coliformic bacteria [13] and for the enrichment and detection of Campylobacter sp. in waters [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1) has been designed to promote recovery and accelerate growth of microbes under aseptic gas flow in adjusted temperatures [6]. It reveals the enteric and other bacteria in clinical, industrial and environmental samples and has also been used in the investigations on the properties of enteric bacteria and interactions between members of the intestinal flora [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12]. The PMEU method has earlier been validated for the detection of coliformic bacteria [13] and for the enrichment and detection of Campylobacter sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further testing on the continuous automated safeguarding of the household waters has been accomplished in Finland [7]. The detection of pathogenic bacteria in waters by the PMEU platform has been carried out for facultatively microaerobic campylobacteria [8], strictly anaerobic Clostridium sp. [9] and anaerobic salmonellas [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tap water artificially contaminated with salmonellas all levels of pathogen load were verified within approximately ten hours using the PMEU Spectrion ® equipped with gas sensors. The PMEU approach turned out to be more efficient in campylobacterial monitoring than the official ISO-method (ISO 17995.2005) in a validation study at the Finnish National Institute of Health and Welfare [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%