2019
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201900497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Electron Transport and Heat Transfer Boost Light Stability of Ternary Organic Photovoltaic Cells Incorporating Non‐Fullerene Small Molecule and Polymer Acceptors

Abstract: fabricating flexible, low-cost, low thermal budget, and lightweight solar panels. [1][2][3][4] Over the past decades, great efforts have been devoted for high-performance OPVs. These efforts include new material synthesis, fine tuning the donor:acceptor (D:A) compositions/morphology, and the optimization of fabrication process. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] A key accomplishment of these efforts is the identification of small molecule acceptors (SMAs). In particular, a bulk heterojunction (BHJ) OPV cell using SMA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing PM6: Y6 and PM6:Y6: ITIC‐Th blends, the increased acceptor domain size in the latter blend potentially favors electron transport, and can partially account for the increased electron mobilities from 3.96 × 10 −4 to 4.54 × 10 −4 cm 2 V −1 second −1 . Besides, it is understandable that PM6:Y6: IT‐4F exhibited the higher electron mobilities than the PM6: Y6 control, which is attributed to the increased CCL of oop π ‐ π peak and the decreased electron energy disorder 73‐75 . All the blend films exhibited reasonable phase segregation scales with acceptor domain size around 20 nm, except for the PM6: ITIC‐Th blend with an acceptor domain size of approximately 49.3 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing PM6: Y6 and PM6:Y6: ITIC‐Th blends, the increased acceptor domain size in the latter blend potentially favors electron transport, and can partially account for the increased electron mobilities from 3.96 × 10 −4 to 4.54 × 10 −4 cm 2 V −1 second −1 . Besides, it is understandable that PM6:Y6: IT‐4F exhibited the higher electron mobilities than the PM6: Y6 control, which is attributed to the increased CCL of oop π ‐ π peak and the decreased electron energy disorder 73‐75 . All the blend films exhibited reasonable phase segregation scales with acceptor domain size around 20 nm, except for the PM6: ITIC‐Th blend with an acceptor domain size of approximately 49.3 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Besides, it is understandable that PM6:Y6: IT-4F exhibited the higher electron mobilities than the PM6: Y6 control, which is attributed to the increased CCL of oop π-π peak and the decreased electron energy disorder. [73][74][75] All the blend films exhibited reasonable phase segregation scales with acceptor domain size around 20 nm, except for the PM6: ITIC-Th blend with an acceptor domain size of approximately 49.3 nm. The excessively large phase separation in PM6: ITIC-Th devices is unfavorable for charge separation, F I G U R E 3 GIWAXS two-dimensional diffraction patterns of A, PM6: Y6 blend; B, PM6:Y6: IT-4F (1:1.12:0.08) blend; C, PM6: IT-4F blend; D, PM6:Y6: ITIC-Th (1:1.12:0.08) blend and E, PM6: ITIC-Th blend.…”
Section: Active Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron energy disorder, σnormale, was also evaluated by temperature‐dependent electron transport measurements using the Gauss disorder model (GDM)μ0 = μexp[(2σ3kT)2 ] exp (βF)where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, μ0 is the zero‐field mobility, β is the Poole–Frenkel slope, F is the applied electric field, and μ is the y ‐intercept from the plot of μ0 versus (1000/ T ) 2 . Figure f shows the μ0,e of the films as a function of the ambient temperature and the linear fit to the experimental data, the slope of which can be used to derive σnormale.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 In this model, charges hop in an energetic manifold with a Gaussian density of states. The width of the manifold is s. Under such a condition, the charge carrier mobility is temperature (T) and electric field (F) dependent and the mobility can be expressed as: [38][39][40][41]…”
Section: N-otft Performances Employing Ppfs As a Dielectric Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%