Enhanced electrochemical performance of surface modified LiCoO2 for all-solid-state lithium batteries

Kim, Jung-Hoon; Kim, Minjeong; Noh, Sungwoo; Lee, Giho; Shin, Dongwook

doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.126

Cited by 60 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The comparative study on the rate-performance between the resulting materials and the HT-LiCoO 2 synthesized through novel liquid phase routes [25,26] or treated by surface modification [27][28][29][30] in recent years is conducted. The resulting material shows a competitive property at the initial charge and discharge capacities.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Solid state synthesis of ultrafine-LiCoO2 by enhanced thermal decomposition of carbonate precursors followed by double-calcining

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Solid state synthesis of ultrafine-LiCoO2 by enhanced thermal decomposition of carbonate precursors followed by double-calcining

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Using solid electrolyte can suppress the lithium dendrite formation and provide the possibility of the application of Li metal anode. [19] ZrO 2 , [20] Li 3 PO 4 , [21] and Li 2 CO 3 [22] were also used as coating layer in sulfide solid electrolyte and show a beneficial effect. [17] Seino et al reported that coating Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 onto the surface of LiNi 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 can help improve the high-rate performance in Li 2 S-P 2 S 5 sulfide solid electrolyte.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ameliorating the Interfacial Problems of Cathode and Solid‐State Electrolytes by Interface Modification of Functional Polymers

Wang

Zhang

Wang

et al. 2018

Advanced Energy Materials

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solid‐state Li secondary batteries may become high energy density storage devices for the next generation of electric vehicles, depending on the compatibility of electrode materials and suitable solid electrolytes. Specifically, it is a great challenge to obtain a stable interface between these solid electrolytes and cathodes. Herein, this issue can be effectively addressed by constructing a poly(acrylonitrile‐co‐butadiene) coated layer onto the surface of LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2 cathode materials. The polymer layer plays a vital role in working as a protective shell to retard side reaction and ameliorate the contact of the solid–solid interface during the cycling process. In the resultant solid‐state batteries, both rate capacity (99 mA h g−1 at 3 C) and cycling stability (75% capacity retention after 400 cycles) are improved after coating. This impressive performance highlights the great importance of layer modification in the cathode and inspires the development of solid‐state batteries toward practical applications.

show abstract

“…21,79,89 Such cathodes can be integrated with the SSE in a number of ways including mechanical bonding. A number of research efforts have reported this type of architecture; [151][152][153][154][155][156][157]159,[176][177][178][179] most notably, the development of Li 9.54 Si 1.74 P 1.33 S 11.7 Cl 0.3 for high temperature (100…”

Section: Development Of Full Cellsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review—Practical Challenges Hindering the Development of Solid State Li Ion Batteries

Kerman

Luntz

Viswanathan

et al. 2017

J. Electrochem. Soc.

590

471

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solid state electrolyte systems boasting Li + conductivity of >10 mS cm −1 at room temperature have opened the potential for developing a solid state battery with power and energy densities that are competitive with conventional liquid electrolyte systems. The primary focus of this review is twofold. First, differences in Li penetration resistance in solid state systems are discussed, and kinetic limitations of the solid state interface are highlighted. Second, technological challenges associated with processing such systems in relevant form factors are elucidated, and architectures needed for cell level devices in the context of product development are reviewed. Specific research vectors that provide high value to advancing solid state batteries are outlined and discussed. Solid state battery systems are of great interest because of potential benefits in gravimetric and volumetric energy density, operable temperature range, and safety in comparison to traditional liquid electrolyte based systems. However, unresolved fundamental issues remain in the quest to fully understand the behavior of all-solid batteries, especially in the area of electrochemical interfaces.1 There are also a number of significant engineering challenges that require methodical effort to enable a tangible product. Some transitions from academic laboratories to entrepreneurial efforts attempting to overcome these challenges remain unsuccessful in efforts to bring a product to the market.2,3 Vital parameters that require robust understanding from a product development standpoint are material cost, cell lifetime and shelf life, cell energy density on a volumetric and gravimetric basis, operable capabilities for given temperature conditions, and safety. The advantage of energy density remains to be realized in solid state electrolytes (SSEs) since most studies to date utilize thick SSEs or cathodes with low active loading compared to liquid counterparts. 4,5 Furthermore, the desire to use SSEs in conjunction with Li metal anodes requires understanding and managing the morphology of Li metal plating, which can impact volumetric energy density. Operation at both higher and lower temperature compared to conventional technologies is a significant potential advantage of SSE systems. However, reports of solid state cells achieving parity with traditional systems at room temperature or any other temperature do not currently exist. The safety, specifically decreased flammability, of SSE systems is another potential advantage but requires ongoing validation and study.6 Unlike current liquid electrolyte systems, 7 the manufacturability and material component costs of SSEs have not been well characterized, and thus the value of these features will need to be weighed accordingly with any added cost. Operating lifetime of SSEs capturing intrinsic materials parameters such as voltage stability, 8 as well as catastrophic failure modes such as shorting, 9 have been briefly investigated, but in the absence of high energy density electrode formulations and appli...

show abstract

Enhanced electrochemical performance of surface modified LiCoO2 for all-solid-state lithium batteries

Cited by 60 publications

References 22 publications

Solid state synthesis of ultrafine-LiCoO2 by enhanced thermal decomposition of carbonate precursors followed by double-calcining

Solid state synthesis of ultrafine-LiCoO2 by enhanced thermal decomposition of carbonate precursors followed by double-calcining

Ameliorating the Interfacial Problems of Cathode and Solid‐State Electrolytes by Interface Modification of Functional Polymers

Review—Practical Challenges Hindering the Development of Solid State Li Ion Batteries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About