2023
DOI: 10.1002/batt.202300228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of NTP/C with Rutile TiO2 Coating, as Anode Material for Sodium‐Ion Batteries

Teja Stüwe,
Daniel Werner,
David Stock
et al.

Abstract: NaTi2(PO4)3 (NTP) is known as a promising insertion‐type anode material for aqueous and non‐aqueous sodium‐ion batteries (SIBs), due to its NASICON‐type open 3D framework which makes a zero‐strain insertion mechanism possible. NTP is considered to be an environmentally friendly, low‐cost and high safety material. However, the electrochemical performance of NTP is limited due to its poor electrical conductivity. In this work a solvothermal synthesis method is used to synthesize NTP with a nanocube (NC) morpholo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We confirmed this using another negative electrode material, NaTi 2 (PO 4 ) 3 , which showed a charge/discharge profile similar to those of other electrolytes (Figure S9). On the NaTi 2 (PO 4 ) 3 composite electrode, solvent decomposition occurred at ∼2.2 V vs Na/Na + , but no additional anodic process at 1.3 V was observed during cycling (Figure S9b). For the 2M15DAP electrolyte, the cycling performance was more stable with CEs near 100% (Figure S10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We confirmed this using another negative electrode material, NaTi 2 (PO 4 ) 3 , which showed a charge/discharge profile similar to those of other electrolytes (Figure S9). On the NaTi 2 (PO 4 ) 3 composite electrode, solvent decomposition occurred at ∼2.2 V vs Na/Na + , but no additional anodic process at 1.3 V was observed during cycling (Figure S9b). For the 2M15DAP electrolyte, the cycling performance was more stable with CEs near 100% (Figure S10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%