2021
DOI: 10.1002/ente.202100183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 by a Negative‐Thermal‐Expansion Material at Elevated Temperature

Abstract: More measures are being developed to enhance the electrochemical stability of single‐crystal LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 (NCM622), but few focus on improving the stability of NCM622 through heat and deformation management. Herein, a negative‐thermal‐expansion (NTE) material of zirconium tungstate ZrW2O8 is adopted to modify NCM622 via a facile method, and the sample with a proper content of ZrW2O8 exhibits superior cycle performance and rate capability. The capacity retention ratio of modified NCM622 is 86.2% (from 19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the bare and the 2AL NCM622 cathode, the 2AL-A NCM622 cathode exhibits the best capacity retention (92.2%) and the highest final capacity (128.4 mAh/g). To the best of our knowledge, the NCM622 cathode modified by Al 2 O 3 ALD and post-annealing shows outstanding capacity retention compared with NCM622 cathodes modified by other methods reported in literature (Table S1) [17,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. It shows only 0.026% capacity loss per cycle, which is lower than most NCM622 cathodes modified by other methods.…”
Section: Crystalmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Compared with the bare and the 2AL NCM622 cathode, the 2AL-A NCM622 cathode exhibits the best capacity retention (92.2%) and the highest final capacity (128.4 mAh/g). To the best of our knowledge, the NCM622 cathode modified by Al 2 O 3 ALD and post-annealing shows outstanding capacity retention compared with NCM622 cathodes modified by other methods reported in literature (Table S1) [17,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. It shows only 0.026% capacity loss per cycle, which is lower than most NCM622 cathodes modified by other methods.…”
Section: Crystalmentioning
confidence: 67%