2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced driving force and charge separation efficiency in disordered SnNb x O y : Boosting photocatalytic activity toward water reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3), and the valence band of SnNb 2 O 6 was 1.435 eV. This result was closed to previous reported results of the conduction band (− 0.68 eV) and valence band (1.42 eV) edge potentials of SnNb 2 O 6 [43]. …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3), and the valence band of SnNb 2 O 6 was 1.435 eV. This result was closed to previous reported results of the conduction band (− 0.68 eV) and valence band (1.42 eV) edge potentials of SnNb 2 O 6 [43]. …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…3a) [42]. The band gap energy E g of the semiconductors (SnNb 2 O 6 and Sn 2 Nb 2 O 7 ) with an indirect electronic transition can be determined by the following equation: αhν = A (hν− E g ) 1/2 , where α, ν, E g , and A are the absorption coefficient, incident light frequency, band gap, and constant, respectively [25, 43]. As illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Columbites are also founded in the literature with further applications in photocatalytic research. The effect of structural distortion of SnNb x O y in comparison with the crystalline SnNb 2 O 6 regarding the photocatalytic activity was investigated by Huang et al [48]. The crystalline sample exhibits a band gap energy of 2.10 eV, while the band gap energies for disordered and amorphous samples were 2.33 eV and 2.43 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Niobium Layered Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UV‐vis spectra (Figure d) showed that BS7 and Bi 2 O 3 both had a strong absorption in visible region, whereas SnO 2 exhibited unobservable visible light absorption (Figure d). On account of Bi 2 Sn 2 O 7 to show an indirect electronic transition (Figure S4), the E g (band gap energy) can be estimated by the following equation: αhν = A ( hν ‐ E g ) 1/2 , in which α , ν , E g , and A are the absorption coefficient, incident light frequency, band gap, and constant, respectively . As illustrated in the inset of Figure d, the band gap energies as well as the visible light absorption feature (Figure S5) of all as‐prepared samples were nearly identical with the variation of Sn(II) content, which can be identified by the comparison of DFT calculated band structure of Bi 2 Sn 2 O 7 and Sn(II)‐Bi 2 Sn 2 O 7 (Figures S6 and S7), proving that the content of Sn(II) in Bi 2 Sn 2 O 7 had minor impact on the visible light absorption capability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%