2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2014.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced disparity estimation in stereo images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of these strict values ensures that the segmentation map will be of high reliability, meaning that most likely, a segment will be comprised of pixels belonging to surfaces with similar spectral behavior. The latter fact is verified also in [39,40]. An example for performing mean-shift segmentation to the blue, green and red bands of Sentinel-2 (S2) data acquired on 20 August 2017 is given in Figure 3.…”
Section: Segmentation Of the Satellite Imagementioning
confidence: 54%
“…The selection of these strict values ensures that the segmentation map will be of high reliability, meaning that most likely, a segment will be comprised of pixels belonging to surfaces with similar spectral behavior. The latter fact is verified also in [39,40]. An example for performing mean-shift segmentation to the blue, green and red bands of Sentinel-2 (S2) data acquired on 20 August 2017 is given in Figure 3.…”
Section: Segmentation Of the Satellite Imagementioning
confidence: 54%
“…As stated, disparity estimation is an extensively-studied problem, and the corresponding literature is long, e.g., [6,7,[18][19][20][21], just to name a few works. According to [7], many of them can be decomposed into a set of distinct generic steps: calculation of a pixel-wise matching-cost, cost aggregation and spatial regularization-optimization.…”
Section: Previous Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when the image radiometric condition is good, the absolute difference (AD), the insensitive measure of Birchfield and Tomasi (BT), or the gradient measure can achieve accurate matching results (Meiet et al, 2011). When the image radiation varies, zero-based normalized cross correlation (ZNCC) and normalized gradient (Zhou and Boulanger, 2012) are often used to compensate for linear radiation distortions between correspondences, while Census (Zabih and Woodfill, 2005;Jiao et al, 2014;Kordelas et al, 2015), mutual information (Paul et al, 1997), and image radiation correction (Jung et al, 2013) are insensitive to nonlinear radiation distortion. Hirschmuller evaluated the popular cost computation methods and concluded that Census and mutual information measures can achieve the best matching results under varying radiometric conditions (Hirschmueller and Scharstein, 2009).…”
Section: Review Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%