advantages of simple device structure, light weight, and low fabrication cost by solution-processing. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Despite the great achievement in fullerene PSCs, fullerene acceptors still suffer from several drawbacks, including high-cost purification, poor morphological stability, and weak absorption in visible wavelength range. To solve these problems, considerable research efforts have been dedicated to nonfullerene acceptors, especially smallmolecular acceptors (SMAs). [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Recently, emerging SMAs have been demonstrated as alternatives to fullerene acceptors because the excellent photovoltaic performance with power conversion efficiency (PCE) has reached 12-14% recently. [18][19][20][21] To achieve more efficient SMA PSCs, it is essential to design donor polymers that can match with SMAs through favorable morphology as the device performance of PSCs is strongly dependent on the blend morphology. Therefore, morphology controlling has become one of research key points and still faces a great challenge. Some practical physical strategies have been developed such as ternary blend, additives, thermal annealing, etc., to finely tune blend morphology and form miscible donor/acceptor mixture. [22,23] In the meantime, exploitation of chemical tools as an alternative strategy to control blend morphology is showing its advantages in finely molecular-scaled controlling. [24] One of the most commonly used chemical strategies for tuning morphology is through the fluorination or alkylthiolation of the polymeric side chains to tune the solubility, aggregation properties, and thus the good miscibility with acceptors. [25] In comparison with the high cost and complex synthetic route of fluorinated modification on polymer side chains, low cost of alkylthiolation is obviously synthetic superior to the former. However, in recent literatures it is found that, on the one hand, the alkylthiolation of polymer side chains can improve polymeric crystallinity and mobility and lead to a high photovoltaic performance; [26,27] on the other hand, the strengthened crystallinity after the alkylthiolation for high crystalline polymer may form dense and isolated polymer domains, which causes serious phase separation and destroys the miscibility at donor/acceptor interfaces. [24,28,29] As the thermodynamic miscibility between donor and acceptor mainly drives the phase separation degree, therefore, Morphology and miscibility control are still a great challenge in polymer solar cells. Despite physical tools being applied, chemical strategies are still limited and complex. To finely tune blend miscibility to obtain optimized morphology, chemical steric engineering is proposed to systemically investigate its effects on optical and electronic properties, especially on a balance between crystallinity and miscibility. By changing the alkylthiol side chain orientation different steric effects are realized in three different polymers. Surprisingly, the photovoltaic device of the polymer PTBB-m with...