2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4974652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced damage characterization using wavefield imaging methods

Abstract: Wavefield imaging methods are becoming a popular tool for characterizing and studying elastic field interactions in a wide variety of material systems. By using a scanning laser vibrometry detection system, the transient displacement fields generated by an ultrasonic source can be visualized and studied in detail. As a tool for quantitative nondestructive evaluation, the visualization of elastic waves provides a unique opportunity for understanding the scattering of elastic waves from insipient damage, where t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-destructive evaluation aims to characterize a defect by the location, shape and size in contrast to the non-destructive testing, which offers information about the presence or absence of a defect. Conducting materials are often evaluated by ultrasonics (Blackshire, 2017), radiography (Alaknanda et al, 2006), thermography (Montinaro et al, 2017), magnetic induction thermography (Ma and Soleimani, 2014), magnetic flux leakage (Layouni et al, 2017) and eddy current testing (Oneida et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-destructive evaluation aims to characterize a defect by the location, shape and size in contrast to the non-destructive testing, which offers information about the presence or absence of a defect. Conducting materials are often evaluated by ultrasonics (Blackshire, 2017), radiography (Alaknanda et al, 2006), thermography (Montinaro et al, 2017), magnetic induction thermography (Ma and Soleimani, 2014), magnetic flux leakage (Layouni et al, 2017) and eddy current testing (Oneida et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%