2015
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Cycling Stability of Lithium‐Ion Batteries Using Graphene‐Wrapped Fe3O4‐Graphene Nanoribbons as Anode Materials

Abstract: A sandwich structured composite of graphene‐wrapped Fe3O4‐graphene nanoribbons is prepared using a facile and cost‐effective approach. The composite demonstrates a high capacity, good rate performance, and greatly improved cycling stability due to the synergistic combination of electrically conductive graphene, graphene nanoribbons, and Fe3O4. The design concept developed mitigates losses that are often seen in nanostructured systems while permitting facile ion access through the material.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(110 reference statements)
6
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate performance of the current PPy-coated hierarchical nanocages is compared with those of recently reported Fe 3 O 4 -based anodes for Li-ion batteries (Table S1, Supporting Information), including bare Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles, bare Fe 3 O 4 nanocages and pure PPy nanocages ( Figures S6 and S7, Supporting Information), Fe 3 O 4 hierarchical hollow microspheres, [17] Fe 3 O 4 @C yolk-shell nanospheres, [16] Fe 3 O 4 @C hollow and solid nanospindles, [13,15] Fe 3 O 4 /graphene nanocomposites. [8,[10][11][12] It is obvious that the rate capability of the current hierarchical and is comparable to just recently reported uniform Fe 3 O 4 @C yolk-shell nanocubes. [9] For directly proving the superior structure stability of these PPy-coated Fe 3 O 4 hierarchical nanocages, SEM observation after 100 cycles at 200 mA g −1 was also carried out, with the 3D hollow cubic morphology being well retained ( Figure S5, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aenm201600256supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The rate performance of the current PPy-coated hierarchical nanocages is compared with those of recently reported Fe 3 O 4 -based anodes for Li-ion batteries (Table S1, Supporting Information), including bare Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles, bare Fe 3 O 4 nanocages and pure PPy nanocages ( Figures S6 and S7, Supporting Information), Fe 3 O 4 hierarchical hollow microspheres, [17] Fe 3 O 4 @C yolk-shell nanospheres, [16] Fe 3 O 4 @C hollow and solid nanospindles, [13,15] Fe 3 O 4 /graphene nanocomposites. [8,[10][11][12] It is obvious that the rate capability of the current hierarchical and is comparable to just recently reported uniform Fe 3 O 4 @C yolk-shell nanocubes. [9] For directly proving the superior structure stability of these PPy-coated Fe 3 O 4 hierarchical nanocages, SEM observation after 100 cycles at 200 mA g −1 was also carried out, with the 3D hollow cubic morphology being well retained ( Figure S5, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aenm201600256supporting
confidence: 86%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] To meet the increasing requirements for high-performance LIBs, intensive efforts have been devoted for superior electrode materials by replacing conventional graphite with transition metal oxides (TMOs), such as Fe 3 O 4 , Mn 3 O 4 , NiO, and ZnO. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] However, they suffer from poor cyclability and low rate capacity, which are caused by the drastic volume change during the charge-discharge cycling and low electric conductivity. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] However, they suffer from poor cyclability and low rate capacity, which are caused by the drastic volume change during the charge-discharge cycling and low electric conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29][30][31] Even through the volume changes may be effectively controlled by flexible substrates, this strategy is still limi ted in improving specific capacity and rate performance. [27][28][29][30][31] Even through the volume changes may be effectively controlled by flexible substrates, this strategy is still limi ted in improving specific capacity and rate performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these issues, one promising approach is to choose a carbonaceous material of high electrical conductivity and fair ductility as an effective matrix to support, disperse, or encapsulate the nanostructured MTMOs, which could buffer large volume expansion and contraction during cycling, while inhibiting agglomeration and enhancing conductivity . Because of its superior electrical conductivity, excellent mechanical flexibility, large surface area, and high thermal and chemical stability, graphene is regarded as one of the most appealing matrices in composite materials combined with TMO nanostructures and exhibits exceptional performance in LIBs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%