2013
DOI: 10.1038/srep03241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Community Structure Detection in Complex Networks with Partial Background Information

Abstract: Community structure detection in complex networks is important since it can help better understand the network topology and how the network works. However, there is still not a clear and widely-accepted definition of community structure, and in practice, different models may give very different results of communities, making it hard to explain the results. In this paper, different from the traditional methodologies, we design an enhanced semi-supervised learning framework for community detection, which can eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most widely-used approach has been to employ pairwise constraints, either must-link or cannot-link, which indicate that either two nodes must be in the same community or must be in different communities. This strategy has been implemented via several algorithms, including modularity-based methods (Li et al 2014), spectral partitioning methods (Habashi et al 2016;Zhang 2013;Zhang et al 2013), a spin-glass model (Eaton and Mansbach 2012), and matrix factorization methods (Shi et al 2015;Zhang 2013). Such approaches have often provided significantly better results on benchmark data, when compared to standard unsupervised algorithms.…”
Section: Semi-supervised Learning In Community Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely-used approach has been to employ pairwise constraints, either must-link or cannot-link, which indicate that either two nodes must be in the same community or must be in different communities. This strategy has been implemented via several algorithms, including modularity-based methods (Li et al 2014), spectral partitioning methods (Habashi et al 2016;Zhang 2013;Zhang et al 2013), a spin-glass model (Eaton and Mansbach 2012), and matrix factorization methods (Shi et al 2015;Zhang 2013). Such approaches have often provided significantly better results on benchmark data, when compared to standard unsupervised algorithms.…”
Section: Semi-supervised Learning In Community Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many semi-supervised community detection algorithms have been proposed [6]- [9]. Ma el al proposed a semi-supervised method based on symmetric non-negative matrix, which incorporates the pairwise constraints into the adjacency matrix for finding the community structure [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A semi-supervised method based on the spin-glass model from statistical physics can integrate the prior information in forms of individual labels and pairwise constrains into community detection proposed by Eaton and Mansbach [7].Zhang [8] studied a semi-supervised learning framework which encodes pairwise constraints by modifying the adjacency matrix of network, which can also be regarded as de-noising the consensus matrix of community structures. Later, Zhang [9] added a logical inference step to utilize the must-link and cannot-link constraints fully. These algorithms use the prior information by transferring and modifying the adjacency matrix directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al extend this framework to other methods including modularity maximization model and Infomap algorithm [ 9 ]. Then Zhang et al further extend this framework by adding a logical inference step to better utilize the supervised information [ 10 ]. This kind of methods often ignore the difference between the pairwise relationship in the network topology and pairwise constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%