2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-022-05121-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced CO2 electrolysis at metal–oxide interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this change in the electrode conductivity may be due to the decrease in electron charge carriers with the increase in the number of oxygen vacancies at higher temperatures. 45 This phenomenon also demonstrates that the LSCF samples exhibit semiconducting and metallic behaviors at low and high temperatures, respectively. 31 Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The reason for this change in the electrode conductivity may be due to the decrease in electron charge carriers with the increase in the number of oxygen vacancies at higher temperatures. 45 This phenomenon also demonstrates that the LSCF samples exhibit semiconducting and metallic behaviors at low and high temperatures, respectively. 31 Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…It is found that the R p of the LSCM(FC) 0.075 -SDC electrode decreases from 0.48 Ω cm 2 (at 1.2 V) to 0.26 Ω cm 2 (at 1.6 V), and the LSCM(FC) 0.075 with a metal−oxide interface exhibits a lower resistance than the LSCM without any interface. 32 This finding suggests that constructing a well-formed metal−oxide interface can increase its electronic and ionic conductivity activity more effectively. Therefore, the polarization resistance is further evidence of the excellent catalytic activity of LSCM(FC) 0.075 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As in Figure f, the polarization resistance ( R p ) descends as the applied potential ascends from 1.2 to 1.6 V, suggesting that increasing the applied voltage is beneficial in motivating the electrode. It is found that the R p of the LSCM(FC) 0.075 -SDC electrode decreases from 0.48 Ω cm 2 (at 1.2 V) to 0.26 Ω cm 2 (at 1.6 V), and the LSCM(FC) 0.075 with a metal–oxide interface exhibits a lower resistance than the LSCM without any interface . This finding suggests that constructing a well-formed metal–oxide interface can increase its electronic and ionic conductivity activity more effectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in the low voltage range, the main processes taking place in the cell are electrode activation and oxygen pumping processes. More importantly, SSOECs exhibit an exceptionally low R p of approximately 0.1 Ω·cm 2 at 2.0 V. This R p value is notably lower in comparison to those of alternative materials such as Sr 2 Fe 1.5+ x Mo 0.5 O 6−δ , Sr 2 Ti 0.8 Co 0.2 FeO 6−δ , and La 0.55 Sr 0.45 Fe 0.85 Mo 0.15 O 3 , suggesting the excellent electrocatalytic activity of the PBFN electrode. From 1.2 to 2.0 V, the current densities within the SSOECs ranged from 0.305 to 1.03 A·cm – 2 at 800 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%