“…Ta ble 1s ummarizes the photovoltaic parameters of V OC ,s hortcircuit current density (J SC ), fill factor (FF), and PCE for various devices.T he photovoltaic performance of the devices based on M-CsPbBr 3 is evidently improved, ac hampion 1%M-CsPbBr 3 -based device displays the optimal performance with a PCE of 9.65 %, J SC of 7.42 mA cm À2 , V OC of 1.584 V, andF Fo f 82.11%,y ieldingamarked improvement in comparison with the pristine CsPbBr 3 PSC (PCE:6 .07 %, J SC :5 .87 mA cm À2 , V OC : 1.401 V, and FF:7 3.80 %) and other reportedC sPbBr 3 solar cells. [34,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45] The dramaticallyl ongerp hotovoltage decay time of the 1%M-CsPbBr 3 -based device compared to that of the control PSC in the dark demonstrates the lower charger ecombination rate of the former,w hich is responsible for the substantially increased V OC as well as J SC outputa nd therefore the PCE (FigureS7). The photovoltaic data of the devices show a downward trend after the addition of melamine exceeds 1%, which is ascribed to the decrease in grain size and the impure phase appearance of the 2% and 4%M-CsPbBr 3 as shown in Figure 2f and Figure 3a.T ov erify the repeatability of the device performance enhancement, the statistical distributions of photovoltaicp arameters (PCE, J SC , V OC ,a nd FF) for 30 random devicesw ere recorded with and without melamine ( Figure S8).…”