2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced charge collection and photocatalysis performance of CdS and PbS nanoclusters co-sensitized TiO2 porous film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation in the sensitized TiO 2 bandgap is caused by the combined effects of PbS and TiO 2 . In addition, the bandgaps of PbS‐TiO 2 (1 h) and PbS‐TiO 2 (2 h) were higher than that of bulk PbS (0.41 eV), which indicated that the size of PbS QDs on TiO 2 are within the scale of nanostructures, consistent with the HR‐TEM results. The catalytic performance of PbS‐TiO 2 (1 h) and PbS‐TiO 2 (2 h) hybrid particles were tested in the catalytic reduction of Cr 6+ .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variation in the sensitized TiO 2 bandgap is caused by the combined effects of PbS and TiO 2 . In addition, the bandgaps of PbS‐TiO 2 (1 h) and PbS‐TiO 2 (2 h) were higher than that of bulk PbS (0.41 eV), which indicated that the size of PbS QDs on TiO 2 are within the scale of nanostructures, consistent with the HR‐TEM results. The catalytic performance of PbS‐TiO 2 (1 h) and PbS‐TiO 2 (2 h) hybrid particles were tested in the catalytic reduction of Cr 6+ .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…[21] The bandgapcan be calculated from the intersection point of the horizontal ordinate and the straight green line. As shown in Figure 6B, the energy bandgap of PbS-TiO 2 (1 h) changed from 3eVf or pure TiO 2 to 1.8 eV.F urthermore, the bandgapo fP bS-TiO 2 (2 h) decreased to 1.5 eV.T he variation in the sensitized TiO 2 bandgap is caused by the combined effects of PbS and TiO 2 .I na ddition, the bandgapso fP bS-TiO 2 (1 h) and PbS-TiO 2 (2 h) were highert han that of bulk PbS (0.41 eV), which indicated that the size of PbS QDs on TiO 2 are within the scale of nanostructures, [22] consistent with the HR-TEM results. The catalytic performanceo fP bS-TiO 2 (1 h) and PbS-TiO 2 (2 h) hybrid particles were tested in the catalytic reduction of Cr 6 + .P henol was added to reactions ystem as at rapping agent for holes (h + )d uring the photocatalytic process before light irradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…With increasing BiOI concentration from 0.008 mol/L to 0.012 mol/L, the band gap of the BiOI/TiO 2 heterostructure decreases from 3.0 to 1.95 eV. However, the band gap of the TBA‐3 heterostructure (2.1 eV) is greater than that of the TNA‐2 sample (1.95 eV) . These results indicate that TBA‐2 has a minimum band gap of 1.95 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Conduction band and valence band potentials were calculated by the empirical equation :ECB=EVB-EnormalgandEnormalg=X-Ee+0.5Enormalg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation