2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.06.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced catalytic capability of electroactive biofilm modified with different kinds of carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They studied charge transfer resistance (Rct) of the anode biofilm was formed on the anode, and after 50 d. The BC-CNT without biofilm showed the lowest resistance, while in response to microbial colonization, the Rct showed an increasing trend (Mashkour et al, 2020). These findings were indicative of the toxicity effect of MWCNTs (at the tested concentration of 0.4 mg/mL) on the mixed-culture biofilm and were approximately in agreement with the data reported by Jiang et al (2018). To mitigate the toxicity effects of MWCNTs on the developed anode biofilm and to enhance its activity, Mashkour et al (2020) tried to modify MWCNTs using biocompatible nanomaterials like polyaniline (PANI) (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Nanomaterials On Exoelectrogens and Anode Performancesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They studied charge transfer resistance (Rct) of the anode biofilm was formed on the anode, and after 50 d. The BC-CNT without biofilm showed the lowest resistance, while in response to microbial colonization, the Rct showed an increasing trend (Mashkour et al, 2020). These findings were indicative of the toxicity effect of MWCNTs (at the tested concentration of 0.4 mg/mL) on the mixed-culture biofilm and were approximately in agreement with the data reported by Jiang et al (2018). To mitigate the toxicity effects of MWCNTs on the developed anode biofilm and to enhance its activity, Mashkour et al (2020) tried to modify MWCNTs using biocompatible nanomaterials like polyaniline (PANI) (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Nanomaterials On Exoelectrogens and Anode Performancesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Despite the increased surface area for bacterial colonization, these nanomaterials have been reported as toxic at specific concentrations against bacteria. A recent work investigating the MWCNT's toxicity effect on microbial growth of Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilm revealed that the maximum MWCNTs concentration for improving anodic biofilm performance (i.e., highest power and current density compared to bare carbon sheet) was found to be 0.1 mg/mL (Jiang et al, 2018). However, further increments in MWCNTs concentration resulted in anodic biofilm's weak performance, suggesting that the MWCNTs concentration must have exceeded its toxic threshold (Jiang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Effects Of Nanomaterials On Exoelectrogens and Anode Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of the present and previous studies have shown that using higher concentrations above threshold limits can have a negative impact on microbial growth and activity due to increased toxicity and reduced biocompatibility, leading to microbial inactivation. On the other hand, increasing the concentration of the catalyst beyond threshold limits may lead to saturation of the electrode surface and reduced attachment of microorganisms on the electrode (13,52). This survey demonstrated that a Ni-coated carbon felt electrode, produced using the electroplating method, can be utilized as a high-e ciency and stable bio-anode material for bio-electrogeneration and wastewater treatment processes.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performance Of Mfcmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…technology, as microorganisms flourish and form biofilm for electron transfer in electrodes as biocatalysts[100][101][102]. Many researchers use carbon felt as an electrode material[103].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copper foam (CuF), carbon rods, and nickel foams (NiF) are the best off-hat properties of cathode electrodes. However, the 32 mg/L chloramphenicol (CAP) were removed using copper foam electrodes[102] within 12 h, which was further based on the carbon rods after 24 h, and nickel foam more than 120 h[10,77]. Antibiotics chloramphenicol is the main product, using carbon rods and foam nickel electrodes with copper foam electrodes, and completely mineralized with CO 2 and H 2 O, each with nitrobenzene (C 6 H 5 NO 2 ), and 4-nitrobenzene alcohol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%