1986
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(86)90234-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Ca2+-induced calcium release by isolated sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles from malignant hyperthermia susceptible pig muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
5

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
31
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The protein profile observed in Fig. 1A (lane a) was similar to that reported by others for porcine skeletal muscle SR preparations [17,24]. SDS-PAGE separations of SR fractions presented by these authors showed fewer bands, especially in the 30-60 kDa range.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…The protein profile observed in Fig. 1A (lane a) was similar to that reported by others for porcine skeletal muscle SR preparations [17,24]. SDS-PAGE separations of SR fractions presented by these authors showed fewer bands, especially in the 30-60 kDa range.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…The effect of breed can clearly be attributed to specific genetic mutations in the case of some highly selected lean pig lines. The first is a well-known mutation RYR1 T , causing a substitution of amino acids (Arg615Cys) in the ryanodine receptor (Fuji et al, 1991), the protein that is responsible for the release of Ca 21 from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (Mickelson et al, 1986). This mutation causes uncontrolled release of Ca…”
Section: Factors Affecting Raw Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the view that there is no time-dependent aspect to the blocking action of halothane during the rising phase of the HVA current and that blockade by halothane is at equilibrium at the time of the first measurable current flow. Halothane is known to enhance release of Ca*+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in skeletal muscle (Beeler and Gable, 1985;Mickelson et al, 1986), and it has been suggested that inhibition of Ca*+ current by halothane may reflect a halothane-induced elevation in intracellular Ca *+, thereby mediating Ca2+-dependent inactivation (Kmjevic, 1974;Krnjevic and Puil, 1988). Because LVA Ca2+ current is not thought to be subject to Ca*+-dependent inactivation, it seems unlikely that elevation of [Caz+], can account for the reduction in LVA.…”
Section: Effects Of Halothane On High-threshold Ca2+ Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely that the release of Ca*+ from intracellular stores could appreciably elevate submembrane Ca2+ under such conditions. Third, a caffeine-releasable pool of intracellular Ca2+, a potential target of halothane action (Beeler and Gable, 1985;Mickelson et al, 1986), does not appear to be present in GH, cells. The present results also provide some information concerning the idea that halothane reduces HVA current either by mimicking the action of a G-protein or by activating a somatostatin-sensitive G-protein that inhibits the Ca*+ current .…”
Section: Mechanism Of Action Of Halothanementioning
confidence: 99%