2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30881-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced BRAF engagement by NRAS mutants capable of promoting melanoma initiation

Abstract: A distinct profile of NRAS mutants is observed in each tumor type. It is unclear whether these profiles are determined by mutagenic events or functional differences between NRAS oncoproteins. Here, we establish functional hallmarks of NRAS mutants enriched in human melanoma. We generate eight conditional, knock-in mouse models and show that rare melanoma mutants (NRAS G12D, G13D, G13R, Q61H, and Q61P) are poor drivers of spontaneous melanoma formation, whereas common melanoma mutants (NRAS Q61R, Q61K, or Q61L)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mice similarly exhibit a bias of specific oncogenic Kras mutations towards different cancer types as different mutant Kras alleles have different tumorigenic potential when activated in different tissues ( Li et al, 2018 ; Poulin et al, 2019 ; Winters et al, 2017 ; Wong et al, 2020 ; Zafra et al, 2020 ). Different oncogenic mutations also affect the ability of Nras to induce tumorigenesis in mice, as do the same mutations in different RAS isoforms ( Burd et al, 2014 ; Haigis et al, 2008 ; Kong et al, 2016 ; Murphy et al, 2022 ). While this tissue ‘tropism’ of cancers towards specific RAS mutations has been appreciated for decades ( Bos, 1989 ), the underlying mechanism is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice similarly exhibit a bias of specific oncogenic Kras mutations towards different cancer types as different mutant Kras alleles have different tumorigenic potential when activated in different tissues ( Li et al, 2018 ; Poulin et al, 2019 ; Winters et al, 2017 ; Wong et al, 2020 ; Zafra et al, 2020 ). Different oncogenic mutations also affect the ability of Nras to induce tumorigenesis in mice, as do the same mutations in different RAS isoforms ( Burd et al, 2014 ; Haigis et al, 2008 ; Kong et al, 2016 ; Murphy et al, 2022 ). While this tissue ‘tropism’ of cancers towards specific RAS mutations has been appreciated for decades ( Bos, 1989 ), the underlying mechanism is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the TN 61R , TN 61L , TN 61K , and TN 13R mouse models to generate NRAS-mutant melanoma cell lines syngeneic to C57BL/6J (Murphy et al, 2022). Each mouse model is homozygous for a melanocyte-specific Cre-ER(T2) transgene (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the TN 61R , TN 61L , TN 61K , and TN 13R mouse models to generate NRAS-mutant melanoma cell lines syngeneic to C57BL/6J (Murphy et al, 2022). Each mouse model is homozygous for a melanocyte-specific Cre-ER(T2) transgene (Tyr::Cre-ER(T2); (Bosenberg et al, 2006)) and a conditional LSL-Nras allele encoding either NRAS Q61R, Q61K, Q61L, or G13R ( Figure 1A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations