1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0017-9310(97)00057-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced boiling heat transfer from microporous surfaces: effects of a coating composition and method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Submerged pool boiling from porous surfaces has been extensively characterized for a number of surface geometries, working fluids, and flooded porous wick structures often found in heat pipes [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The fundamental mechanism of heat transfer during boiling from a porous surface submerged in a liquid pool differs from that from a wick that is passively fed by capillary action.…”
Section: Nucleate Boiling In Porous Wick Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submerged pool boiling from porous surfaces has been extensively characterized for a number of surface geometries, working fluids, and flooded porous wick structures often found in heat pipes [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The fundamental mechanism of heat transfer during boiling from a porous surface submerged in a liquid pool differs from that from a wick that is passively fed by capillary action.…”
Section: Nucleate Boiling In Porous Wick Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HTFF 174-8 High wettability of the micro and nanostructured plates has negative effect on nucleate boiling heat transfer while they have roughness elements, which have a positive effect [23]. As a result of the interplay between these two effects, the heat transfer coefficients are close to each other for both treated and untreated surfaces.…”
Section: Boiling Curves and Heat Transfer Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty in the heat flux measurements were found using the the same method as Chang and You [11] and Kim et al [2] due to the similarities in the test heater and procedure. This uncertainty was estimated to be ± 6% for heat fluxes between 0-50 W/cm².…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%